Looking for a coach? Sign up for a coaching consulting call today!
Dec. 21, 2023

Bridging clinician and researcher perspectives with Dr. Eman Metwally

Bridging clinician and researcher perspectives with Dr. Eman Metwally
The player is loading ...
Clinician Researcher

Dr. Eman Metwally is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. She earned her MD-PhD degree from Alexandria University in Egypt and has 2 master degrees -- Biomedical informatics and clinical research. Dr. Metwally's research interests lie at the intersection of cancer epidemiology and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.

In this episode, Dr. Metwally shares her inspiring journey from seasoned pulmonary and critical care clinician to avid research scientist.

Key Points Discussed:

  • Clinical Insights vs. Research Goals: Dr. Metwally highlights the importance of understanding clinical experiences and effectively communicating the need for refined disease classifications in research.
  • Collaboration Dynamics: The intricacies of collaboration between clinicians and researchers and the need for mutual understanding and patience.
  • Learning from Varied Perspectives: The importance of seeking diverse viewpoints, using visualization tools, and involving stakeholders to enrich research perspectives.

Call to Action:

Explore opportunities to bridge the gap between clinical expertise and research methodologies in your field. Seek diverse perspectives and engage in collaborative efforts to enhance patient care and medical advancements.

Sponsor/Advertising/Monetization Information:

This episode is sponsored by Coag Coach LLC, a leading provider of coaching resources for clinicians transitioning to become research leaders. Coag Coach LLC is committed to supporting clinicians in their academic and research endeavors.

Transcript

1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,860 Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast, where academic clinicians learn the skills 2 00:00:05,860 --> 00:00:11,260 to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor. 3 00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:17,340 As clinicians, we spend a decade or more as trainees learning to take care of patients. 4 00:00:17,340 --> 00:00:22,380 When we finally start our careers, we want to build research programs, but then we find 5 00:00:22,380 --> 00:00:27,780 that our years of clinical training did not adequately prepare us to lead our research 6 00:00:27,780 --> 00:00:29,200 program. 7 00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:35,480 Through no fault of our own, we struggle to find mentors, and when we can't, we quit. 8 00:00:35,480 --> 00:00:40,580 However, clinicians hold the keys to the greatest research breakthroughs. 9 00:00:40,580 --> 00:00:46,200 For this reason, the Clinician Researcher podcast exists to give academic clinicians 10 00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:51,800 the tools to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor. 11 00:00:51,800 --> 00:01:01,100 Now introducing your host, Toyosi Onwuemene. 12 00:01:01,100 --> 00:01:03,560 Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast. 13 00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:07,440 I'm your host Toyosi Onwuemene, and it is such a privilege to be here. 14 00:01:07,440 --> 00:01:12,760 I am super excited about today's episode because I have a really extra special guest. 15 00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:14,920 It's Dr. Eman Metwaly. 16 00:01:14,920 --> 00:01:16,780 And Iman, I want to thank you. 17 00:01:16,780 --> 00:01:17,780 Welcome to the show. 18 00:01:17,780 --> 00:01:18,780 Hi, Teoci. 19 00:01:18,780 --> 00:01:21,540 Actually, I want to thank you too. 20 00:01:21,540 --> 00:01:25,440 Thank you so much for the invitation, and I'm really excited. 21 00:01:25,440 --> 00:01:27,040 Thank you for being here. 22 00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:30,180 So Iman, the audience is excited to get to know you. 23 00:01:30,180 --> 00:01:34,680 I want you to introduce yourself to the audience, especially from the perspective of yourself 24 00:01:34,680 --> 00:01:37,160 as a clinician and a researcher. 25 00:01:37,160 --> 00:01:38,160 Yeah. 26 00:01:38,160 --> 00:01:43,160 So currently, I am a second year post-doctoral center in the epidemiology department of the 27 00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:48,360 School of Public Health at the University of North Carolina, Chappell Hand. 28 00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:51,280 I used actually to be a pulmonary and critical care physician. 29 00:01:51,280 --> 00:01:56,680 I practiced for nine years in Egypt as a pulmonary and critical care. 30 00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:03,260 So during my residency and then my PhD program after I finished my residency, and then maybe 31 00:02:03,260 --> 00:02:07,280 one year after, I practiced pulmonary medicine. 32 00:02:07,280 --> 00:02:12,600 Then when I immigrated here to the U.S., I studied biomedical health informatics, and 33 00:02:12,600 --> 00:02:16,840 then I joined UNC as a research fellow. 34 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:19,240 And this is my current position nowadays. 35 00:02:19,240 --> 00:02:20,240 Wow. 36 00:02:20,240 --> 00:02:22,120 Iman, thank you for sharing. 37 00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:28,000 So you have a unique story where you actually finished your clinical training, and you practiced 38 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:31,720 as a clinician, and then you made the transition to research. 39 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:37,800 So I would love for you to share with our audience, what were the big ahas for you, 40 00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:43,500 where you had already been the expert clinically, and now you are kind of starting training 41 00:02:43,500 --> 00:02:45,120 as a researcher? 42 00:02:45,120 --> 00:02:47,320 What were the big surprises for you? 43 00:02:47,320 --> 00:02:48,680 Well, thank you. 44 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:51,440 This is a great question, and I really love this question. 45 00:02:51,440 --> 00:02:52,440 When did it start? 46 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:54,080 When did the spark start? 47 00:02:54,080 --> 00:02:57,200 So training started at the bedside. 48 00:02:57,200 --> 00:03:02,040 So I was a resident, maybe towards the end of my third year as a pulmonary and critical 49 00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:03,040 care resident. 50 00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:07,340 And the system there in Egypt is a little bit different with me back up. 51 00:03:07,340 --> 00:03:13,900 So in Egypt, we do six years for medical school, and then one year as an internship, and then 52 00:03:13,900 --> 00:03:16,360 we apply for our residency. 53 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:21,320 And the residency does not start with internal medicine, it just starts with the specialty. 54 00:03:21,320 --> 00:03:27,440 So I went straight from the internship to pulmonary and critical care specialty. 55 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:33,480 And as I said, I was interacting with patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary 56 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:35,040 disease. 57 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:41,800 And treaties got my attention into how the patients, for example, with lung cancer, would 58 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:49,560 be staged based on radiology, CT, and other investigations into stage one. 59 00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:54,840 And maybe after following up this patient, you would find different trajectory for them. 60 00:03:54,840 --> 00:03:59,400 Like some patients with stage one would do very well, and some patients with stage one 61 00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:01,720 would do very unwell. 62 00:04:01,720 --> 00:04:03,560 And some would have the same for survival. 63 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:07,340 It's not only like their quality of life, but also for survival. 64 00:04:07,340 --> 00:04:13,720 So this heterogeneity in the patient's outcome, despite they have the same classification 65 00:04:13,720 --> 00:04:19,640 that we classified them initially on clinical side, made me think about the heterogeneity 66 00:04:19,640 --> 00:04:28,040 of disease and the link between how we classify and diagnose patient and put them into boxes 67 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:33,880 based on our classification, like lung cancer based on the stage and the histology, COPD 68 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:37,600 based on the pulmonary function severity. 69 00:04:37,600 --> 00:04:43,440 And how this box that we put the patient in, this are in their outcome when we follow up 70 00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:48,960 them during their clinical course and during our clinical care for them. 71 00:04:48,960 --> 00:04:54,220 So I started in, during residency in Egypt, we have to prepare like a master degree. 72 00:04:54,220 --> 00:05:02,080 So I prepared my proposal was about like description of the clinical profile, histology, radiology 73 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:03,520 for patients with lung cancer. 74 00:05:03,520 --> 00:05:06,320 That is attending our university hospital. 75 00:05:06,320 --> 00:05:14,240 So the hospital that I worked in was a tertiary level hospital that served a big area in Egypt. 76 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:20,120 It's not only in Alexandria city, but also in the area, like the small towns around Alexandria 77 00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:22,320 city. 78 00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:31,400 So I had maybe around more than 300 patients for my study, 112 of them had lung cancer 79 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:35,920 and the rest were controls, patients who did not have lung cancer. 80 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:40,960 And I started to look up into these patients at all levels from how they are diagnosed 81 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:45,400 initially and how their diagnosis was confirmed. 82 00:05:45,400 --> 00:05:50,560 And later on their trajectory towards treatment, who got surgical treatment and who got like 83 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:52,920 chemotherapy or radiotherapy. 84 00:05:52,920 --> 00:05:59,080 And I got fascinated by, as I said, how much different their course would end up despite 85 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:04,800 they had been classified initially into the same category, based on clinical side. 86 00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:12,120 Then after finishing my master degree, I, in the same year, it was around 2011 maybe, 87 00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:14,000 I attached it to the BHD program. 88 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:19,320 And my initial proposal was actually to continue into understanding more about heterogeneity 89 00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:20,880 of lung cancer. 90 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:26,520 I was looking into doing some, you know, molecular signature type of study to understand how 91 00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:32,200 the genotyping of these patients might explain the heterogeneity in their clinical outcome 92 00:06:32,200 --> 00:06:33,200 later on. 93 00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:40,840 But the techniques that is necessary for doing the genotyping and the molecular data analysis 94 00:06:40,840 --> 00:06:44,760 was not feasible to me at the institution I worked in. 95 00:06:44,760 --> 00:06:47,360 So I had to switch gears. 96 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:53,680 So I'm glad because I said, okay, so maybe lung cancer was very complex and, you know, 97 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:57,820 the neoplasm stuff and the progression of the disease is very aggressive. 98 00:06:57,820 --> 00:07:01,980 So maybe that's why there was heterogeneous outcome in the patient. 99 00:07:01,980 --> 00:07:08,420 Let's switch to another maybe chronic, more benign disease, and that's what COVD. 100 00:07:08,420 --> 00:07:13,320 And then after, just not to make it like a long story, after I started the clinical profile 101 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:18,740 again, radiology, and yeah, at that time during my PhD, I had to do something more complicated. 102 00:07:18,740 --> 00:07:24,360 So I also did endoscopic visualization of their airways and found that the heterogeneity 103 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:25,960 is so severe. 104 00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:30,860 The more you go into detail, the more you examine the patient, not only clinically and 105 00:07:30,860 --> 00:07:36,120 maybe physiologically and based on the lab, but the more you go inside the patient by 106 00:07:36,120 --> 00:07:41,240 the endoscope, for example, in my case, and looking into how their endobronchial erythema 107 00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:47,520 is visualized and process their samples from the bronchial wall, the more you discover 108 00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:53,100 the shortage of how we classify them based on the clinical side. 109 00:07:53,100 --> 00:07:59,760 So I got fascinated by that we should improve classification of our diseases. 110 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:02,160 And these are common diseases, COVD and lung cancer. 111 00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:08,560 They are very common everywhere in the world, not only in developed or developing countries. 112 00:08:08,560 --> 00:08:14,140 So that was like the thing that's pushing me that we have some, I might have something 113 00:08:14,140 --> 00:08:20,520 that I can contribute to improve how the patient can be classified. 114 00:08:20,520 --> 00:08:25,320 Because our classification determine our management of the disease. 115 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:30,560 So if we classify them more precisely, we would be able to treat them more precisely 116 00:08:30,560 --> 00:08:33,840 and accordingly we will improve their outcome at the end. 117 00:08:33,840 --> 00:08:36,040 So yeah, that's a lot. 118 00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:37,040 Wow. 119 00:08:37,040 --> 00:08:38,040 No, thank you for sharing. 120 00:08:38,040 --> 00:08:41,560 One of the things I have to say is, first of all, I love the passion with which you 121 00:08:41,560 --> 00:08:42,800 speak about the work. 122 00:08:42,800 --> 00:08:44,800 I mean, it's just so awesome. 123 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:49,240 And another thing I see is that, so you're talking about lung cancer classification or 124 00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:52,440 COPD classification or classification of lung diseases. 125 00:08:52,440 --> 00:08:54,640 And these are diseases that have been classified. 126 00:08:54,640 --> 00:08:57,980 But as a clinician, you could see that there's a gap. 127 00:08:57,980 --> 00:09:02,600 And so the classification doesn't always help you tell how they're going to do. 128 00:09:02,600 --> 00:09:07,240 And so you're seeing opportunity for a new or a more refined classification. 129 00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:13,560 And so we already have solutions, but you're looking for finer, more specific solutions 130 00:09:13,560 --> 00:09:17,440 so that we can classify patients according to how they actually do because it's going 131 00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:18,440 to affect outcomes. 132 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:23,400 I love the excitement that you talk about with which you talk about it. 133 00:09:23,400 --> 00:09:24,600 It's so awesome. 134 00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:30,840 I want you to speak to what are the advantages you've had as a clinician who's gone into 135 00:09:30,840 --> 00:09:34,040 kind of like a very solitary research focus. 136 00:09:34,040 --> 00:09:38,320 And what are the disadvantages of being a clinician in this space? 137 00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:41,720 Yeah, thank you for asking this question. 138 00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:48,920 So I feel that one of the biggest advantage I had as a clinician is that I was at the 139 00:09:48,920 --> 00:09:51,320 bedside of the patient. 140 00:09:51,320 --> 00:09:57,280 I felt the patient, how the patient is confused at the beginning, their suffering to know 141 00:09:57,280 --> 00:09:59,680 their diagnosis. 142 00:09:59,680 --> 00:10:01,920 Are they like, and their prognosis. 143 00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:03,100 How much are they going? 144 00:10:03,100 --> 00:10:08,000 How much time I have doctors, especially when it is a new blast, getting in touch with their 145 00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:14,680 caregivers, knowing about the burden of caring for a patient with lung cancer or whatever. 146 00:10:14,680 --> 00:10:20,920 And at that time during my residency, I was around 2008 and there was in the institution 147 00:10:20,920 --> 00:10:26,920 I worked at and there was no much, if I would say like targeted treatment or maybe advanced 148 00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:29,320 treatment for lung cancer. 149 00:10:29,320 --> 00:10:35,040 So even if the patient was diagnosed at an early stage, it was like kind of maybe an 150 00:10:35,040 --> 00:10:38,680 early notice of death for their caregivers. 151 00:10:38,680 --> 00:10:42,460 And some would like even hide the diagnosis from their patient. 152 00:10:42,460 --> 00:10:51,380 So feeling all of that, I think was understand like the force that is moving me and pushing 153 00:10:51,380 --> 00:10:57,240 me forward to like what I am doing, the research I'm doing now will make a difference, not 154 00:10:57,240 --> 00:11:01,560 only in the life of the patient, but also in the life of the people who are surrounding 155 00:11:01,560 --> 00:11:04,240 the patient, who are taking care of the patient. 156 00:11:04,240 --> 00:11:12,360 So this was one of the biggest advantage I feel that I had and that is living with me 157 00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:17,120 now even after I left the clinical practice side. 158 00:11:17,120 --> 00:11:23,340 Another point is that the mentorship, I really was like, it was my pleasure actually to work 159 00:11:23,340 --> 00:11:30,360 under the supervision of great mentors who despite many of the like maybe like there 160 00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:37,520 was in, I was working in a university hospital, tertiary level hospital, but not all the techniques 161 00:11:37,520 --> 00:11:41,360 that we need to conduct the research was there. 162 00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:46,800 And actually one of my like mentorship team like connected me with some of the mentors 163 00:11:46,800 --> 00:11:50,800 or some of his colleagues and friends in Europe. 164 00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:55,800 And we started to talk about maybe some of the stuff that we can do together, but again, 165 00:11:55,800 --> 00:12:00,720 some of the regulations, especially regarding like transferring some of the samples to be 166 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:09,360 processed overseas was like kind of not allowed maybe from this point. 167 00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:16,880 And it stopped the research from going farther, but at least just having access to other like 168 00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:22,120 the experts in this field through my mentors was a great advantage. 169 00:12:22,120 --> 00:12:23,840 And it was like, there is no limit. 170 00:12:23,840 --> 00:12:29,220 You can reach there or maybe after you finish your PhD here, maybe you can travel overseas 171 00:12:29,220 --> 00:12:32,620 to continue your line of research. 172 00:12:32,620 --> 00:12:39,240 So I was fortunate to have these mentors as role models and as like someone who always 173 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:45,880 encourages someone who listen despite all, you know, I was doing my PhD in palm tree 174 00:12:45,880 --> 00:12:52,680 medicine at the same time I was practicing and just having someone who supervise you 175 00:12:52,680 --> 00:12:56,760 who is flexible, who is understanding was a big thing to me. 176 00:12:56,760 --> 00:13:03,780 And then some of this advantage is that not everything was bright and good. 177 00:13:03,780 --> 00:13:10,400 Like as I had some good mentors, I also had some other voices who would tell me because 178 00:13:10,400 --> 00:13:17,640 who would tell me like, why you are aiming too big in your research? 179 00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:23,400 Why you are like, like part of my PhD actually research was done in collaboration with Harvard 180 00:13:23,400 --> 00:13:24,400 University. 181 00:13:24,400 --> 00:13:30,400 So I was in Egypt in doing my research and I was sending them some of the image radiological 182 00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:37,720 images over the email and they were developing a new software for quantitative image analysis. 183 00:13:37,720 --> 00:13:43,600 And their software was not yet on, you know, ready to be used, but they really helped with 184 00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:46,680 me and we were like experimenting together. 185 00:13:46,680 --> 00:13:55,160 How can we use my relatively primitive CT images to get into how the COPD can be classified 186 00:13:55,160 --> 00:13:59,100 in a quantitative manner? 187 00:13:59,100 --> 00:14:05,520 So while I was doing that, I heard other voices actually from around me in the institution 188 00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:08,240 I work in and why I'm going too far? 189 00:14:08,240 --> 00:14:09,720 Why are you doing this? 190 00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:13,640 Maybe this will be your last maybe research you are doing in this area. 191 00:14:13,640 --> 00:14:19,160 So just finish, you know, finish and do a good job, but you don't have to be very sophisticated 192 00:14:19,160 --> 00:14:20,160 to this extent. 193 00:14:20,160 --> 00:14:22,280 But I didn't listen to that. 194 00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:26,520 Like I know that if I wanted to do something, I want to, like, I don't know what will come 195 00:14:26,520 --> 00:14:27,520 next. 196 00:14:27,520 --> 00:14:30,360 I didn't know that I'm going to immigrate to the US. 197 00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:32,200 I didn't know anything about that. 198 00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:39,960 But I was fascinated when I go, when I finish my like here for my patient and at when I 199 00:14:39,960 --> 00:14:45,600 at the end of the day at night, I would go into my laptop and I greet other people research 200 00:14:45,600 --> 00:14:48,880 in this area and I would say there are a lot to do. 201 00:14:48,880 --> 00:14:49,880 There are lots and rules. 202 00:14:49,880 --> 00:14:53,160 There are a lot that I can collaborate on. 203 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:56,720 I can bring to the, you know, to the table. 204 00:14:56,720 --> 00:15:02,200 And that's really what fascinated me about research is that no matter your background 205 00:15:02,200 --> 00:15:09,640 is, no matter your country of origin is, no matter your, how you look is, it doesn't matter 206 00:15:09,640 --> 00:15:14,080 as long as you are going to have a good idea and you will have the good people to collaborate 207 00:15:14,080 --> 00:15:16,380 with it will work. 208 00:15:16,380 --> 00:15:24,160 So yeah, so that's how I tried to use my advantage to overcome my disadvantage. 209 00:15:24,160 --> 00:15:27,880 And I think that I did something good. 210 00:15:27,880 --> 00:15:30,840 Yeah, thank you so much. 211 00:15:30,840 --> 00:15:33,200 That was, that was really, really insightful. 212 00:15:33,200 --> 00:15:39,280 I hear you talk about just the relationships with mentors that really helped you move forward 213 00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:43,860 and allowed you to find the expertise you needed to move your research forward. 214 00:15:43,860 --> 00:15:48,400 But then also people who were naysayers who say, well, you're moving too fast. 215 00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:49,600 You're trying to do too much. 216 00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:51,320 You're being too sophisticated. 217 00:15:51,320 --> 00:15:53,260 Slow down or pull back. 218 00:15:53,260 --> 00:15:56,320 And really you had a sense that this was so important. 219 00:15:56,320 --> 00:16:00,020 And that's why even though people told you don't do it, you still moved forward, which 220 00:16:00,020 --> 00:16:01,540 is so awesome. 221 00:16:01,540 --> 00:16:04,600 And I just want to encourage our listeners because this is something that comes up all 222 00:16:04,600 --> 00:16:09,080 the time where people will hold you back or people will say you're trying too hard or, 223 00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:11,880 you know, slow down or try a different perspective. 224 00:16:11,880 --> 00:16:16,840 I think what I'm hearing, and you didn't say it explicitly, Iman, was just that your heart 225 00:16:16,840 --> 00:16:22,720 and your gut, like your sense of the importance of your work really does matter. 226 00:16:22,720 --> 00:16:26,880 And even when you don't find support, it's important to continue to push forward. 227 00:16:26,880 --> 00:16:27,880 Yes, exactly. 228 00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:33,400 Thank you for liking it, for using it in maybe a much better way than mine. 229 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:34,400 It is this. 230 00:16:34,400 --> 00:16:35,400 Yeah, it is this. 231 00:16:35,400 --> 00:16:39,400 The message is that when you believe in the cause, even when you believe that the cause 232 00:16:39,400 --> 00:16:43,280 is bigger than me, it is not me that I wanted to do it. 233 00:16:43,280 --> 00:16:49,720 It's just that I wanted to be part in order to push this, you know, push this cause to 234 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:51,560 a better place. 235 00:16:51,560 --> 00:16:54,480 Push our patient care to a better place. 236 00:16:54,480 --> 00:16:55,480 And I see some light. 237 00:16:55,480 --> 00:16:59,840 There are some light here and not a lot of people are paying attention to this area. 238 00:16:59,840 --> 00:17:01,720 So let's highlight it. 239 00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:05,600 I don't know how I'm going to highlight it, but I will keep pushing and see how it goes 240 00:17:05,600 --> 00:17:06,600 from there. 241 00:17:06,600 --> 00:17:07,880 So absolutely. 242 00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:10,360 And that's where great breakthroughs come. 243 00:17:10,360 --> 00:17:14,840 So one thing you talked about that I really want us to talk about is collaboration. 244 00:17:14,840 --> 00:17:20,320 So now you're a full-time researcher, sometimes looking to collaborate with clinicians. 245 00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:26,400 Tell me about how clinician scientists should think about their collaborations and especially 246 00:17:26,400 --> 00:17:28,960 with regard to the clinician perspective. 247 00:17:28,960 --> 00:17:30,440 Yeah. 248 00:17:30,440 --> 00:17:38,080 So let me talk about when I started as a clinician who collaborated during my residency and my 249 00:17:38,080 --> 00:17:39,080 PhD study. 250 00:17:39,080 --> 00:17:43,160 Like I did research in lung cancer and in COPD. 251 00:17:43,160 --> 00:17:47,840 And at that time I was collaborating with other people who maybe are not practicing 252 00:17:47,840 --> 00:17:54,000 with patients like pathology professors and those from the community medicine or public 253 00:17:54,000 --> 00:17:56,820 health school in Egypt. 254 00:17:56,820 --> 00:18:03,160 So really as a clinician, I had the idea that I wanted to look into this question, but I 255 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:11,800 didn't know that I should go maybe might, I should might have gone earlier in my research 256 00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:20,440 question phase to maybe an epidemiology expert just to see how I should design them. 257 00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:25,420 I study how many patients are required, sample size calculation, all of these details. 258 00:18:25,420 --> 00:18:31,680 So being a clinician who wanted to do something like at population level, I should have gone 259 00:18:31,680 --> 00:18:38,480 earlier to someone who's expert just to give me guidelines about how many should I enroll, 260 00:18:38,480 --> 00:18:40,420 what are the settings of enrollment. 261 00:18:40,420 --> 00:18:41,420 These are important. 262 00:18:41,420 --> 00:18:46,080 So collaborating and engaging and talking about your research question while you are 263 00:18:46,080 --> 00:18:52,480 a clinician with a large, larger group of people, people who are outside your departments, 264 00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:54,840 people who are not practicing medicine. 265 00:18:54,840 --> 00:19:00,200 Even what I learned later on is that just talk it with the day people, people in your 266 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:06,760 family, see how they see that research question and its impact on whatever their friends or 267 00:19:06,760 --> 00:19:09,540 whoever had the disease and they know of. 268 00:19:09,540 --> 00:19:14,920 So listening to many perspectives would add a lot of depth to your research question. 269 00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:21,200 So this is a thing when I came here to, and be patient. 270 00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:28,160 So as a clinician, we have also like narrow time maybe to spend in research and we had 271 00:19:28,160 --> 00:19:31,480 in our mind, like some things are common sense. 272 00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:36,560 Like the collaborator in front of me should have, you know, understand it from my first 273 00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:38,600 time I have said it. 274 00:19:38,600 --> 00:19:41,600 But the actual or the reality is not that. 275 00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:46,480 Like what is common sense to you from your perspective is not necessarily the same from 276 00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:48,200 the other person perspective. 277 00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:54,840 So maybe talking about your research in different ways, visualize your research question, visualize 278 00:19:54,840 --> 00:19:58,040 why it is needed in different ways and multiple ways. 279 00:19:58,040 --> 00:20:02,160 And now it is very easy because we have a lot of visualization tools and we have a lot 280 00:20:02,160 --> 00:20:07,520 of evidence that is available, you know, online from previous research. 281 00:20:07,520 --> 00:20:11,760 All of this like advertise for your research question. 282 00:20:11,760 --> 00:20:17,280 And if you don't know how to talk about it, eloquently talk with the people from your, 283 00:20:17,280 --> 00:20:21,880 you know, field who can talk about it and, you know, steal their words. 284 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:26,120 If this is like after under their permission. 285 00:20:26,120 --> 00:20:31,880 The whole idea is try to highlight the need for your research question as much possible 286 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:33,440 as you can. 287 00:20:33,440 --> 00:20:36,960 Use all the resources around you and be patient. 288 00:20:36,960 --> 00:20:40,160 So this is I think when I was a clinician. 289 00:20:40,160 --> 00:20:45,080 And now when I moved to the U.N. and I am included, like I'm enrolled only in research 290 00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:52,440 sites, what I see, like what I would love for my clinical collaborators to do is that 291 00:20:52,440 --> 00:20:59,480 maybe attend more often the research group meetings, like listen to how they receive 292 00:20:59,480 --> 00:21:00,720 your research question. 293 00:21:00,720 --> 00:21:08,160 How they there are many decisions that are needed to be taken regarding the study design, 294 00:21:08,160 --> 00:21:14,400 regarding the number of patients needed, regarding the study settings that will not be solved 295 00:21:14,400 --> 00:21:20,040 unless they had this clinical understanding of how the magnitude of the problem at the 296 00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:21,820 clinical sites. 297 00:21:21,820 --> 00:21:28,040 So really talking with the people back and forth and being patient sometimes like the 298 00:21:28,040 --> 00:21:33,160 person who abstracted data from electronic cancer record or, you know, manipulate the 299 00:21:33,160 --> 00:21:37,000 data to create the variables we need. 300 00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:42,520 They need a lot of back and forth just to create the correct variable to make sure that 301 00:21:42,520 --> 00:21:47,200 after the data analysis is done, that you are, that the data analysis is answering your 302 00:21:47,200 --> 00:21:50,360 question, not answering another question. 303 00:21:50,360 --> 00:21:54,240 And be patient because sometimes after all of that work, there might be a small error 304 00:21:54,240 --> 00:22:01,280 in the coding that you have to maybe repeat the data analyst has to repeat the data analysis 305 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:04,240 again in order to answer your research question. 306 00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:08,400 So this is another point that I learned really during doing my research and I am learning 307 00:22:08,400 --> 00:22:16,120 now at UNC is that always question your results. 308 00:22:16,120 --> 00:22:22,320 So just don't be very happy about breakthrough or very large association you found. 309 00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:28,120 Always question the validity of your results and try to do as you know, sensitivity analysis 310 00:22:28,120 --> 00:22:34,000 as much as you can in order to make sure that what I am exporting to the scientific world 311 00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:35,000 is correct. 312 00:22:35,000 --> 00:22:37,400 Do the best of my not. 313 00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:42,760 So this kind of checking, check, checking my results and, and making sure that what 314 00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:51,080 I am saying is credible, I think is very beneficial for myself first as, as a researcher, you 315 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:57,480 know, early stage researcher trying to build a name for myself in the research world and 316 00:22:57,480 --> 00:23:02,280 also for the research, scientific research environment in general. 317 00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:04,120 We wanted to have like good data. 318 00:23:04,120 --> 00:23:08,000 We want to have to build the trust in the research community. 319 00:23:08,000 --> 00:23:15,680 So again, it needs patience, a lot of involvement, talking a lot to each other at the collaboration 320 00:23:15,680 --> 00:23:16,680 table. 321 00:23:16,680 --> 00:23:18,280 So yeah, that's, that's really awesome. 322 00:23:18,280 --> 00:23:19,280 Thank you, Iman. 323 00:23:19,280 --> 00:23:23,880 What I hear you saying is that, so clinicians have a lot of knowledge that they don't remember 324 00:23:23,880 --> 00:23:25,880 that nobody else has. 325 00:23:25,880 --> 00:23:26,880 Yeah. 326 00:23:26,880 --> 00:23:27,880 Yes. 327 00:23:27,880 --> 00:23:34,200 And the importance of not being, not being afraid to over communicate, like continue 328 00:23:34,200 --> 00:23:38,680 to just because you shared something once doesn't mean you can't share it again or doesn't 329 00:23:38,680 --> 00:23:40,720 mean that they got it the first time. 330 00:23:40,720 --> 00:23:46,640 And so taking responsibility for communicating and also checking that the communication was 331 00:23:46,640 --> 00:23:48,280 delivered or understood. 332 00:23:48,280 --> 00:23:49,280 Correctly. 333 00:23:49,280 --> 00:23:50,280 Yeah. 334 00:23:50,280 --> 00:23:51,280 Yes. 335 00:23:51,280 --> 00:23:56,340 Because they might seem that they got it, but they do not get your point, your find 336 00:23:56,340 --> 00:23:57,340 point. 337 00:23:57,340 --> 00:23:58,340 Sure. 338 00:23:58,340 --> 00:23:59,340 Sure. 339 00:23:59,340 --> 00:24:00,340 Yeah. 340 00:24:00,340 --> 00:24:04,760 And then I'm also hearing that it's important for the clinician to stay involved and to 341 00:24:04,760 --> 00:24:10,880 help question the data when it comes out, where it's like, okay, why does this say this? 342 00:24:10,880 --> 00:24:11,880 Does this make sense? 343 00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:17,280 Even if it's an exciting finding to actually be willing to question the data so that you 344 00:24:17,280 --> 00:24:22,760 can make sure that what you have is high quality before you release it to the scientific community. 345 00:24:22,760 --> 00:24:23,760 Yes, exactly. 346 00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:24,760 Yeah. 347 00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:25,760 Yes. 348 00:24:25,760 --> 00:24:26,760 I love that. 349 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:31,260 I love your comment about staying involved because clinicians can be very busy. 350 00:24:31,260 --> 00:24:35,400 And so I want you to just, actually you gave great recommendations. 351 00:24:35,400 --> 00:24:37,120 You said attend the meetings. 352 00:24:37,120 --> 00:24:38,120 Yeah. 353 00:24:38,120 --> 00:24:42,560 So that they can help answer questions at that point, which is awesome. 354 00:24:42,560 --> 00:24:47,520 I'm wondering if there are any other practical steps that clinicians can use to stay involved 355 00:24:47,520 --> 00:24:49,140 in the research? 356 00:24:49,140 --> 00:24:58,400 I think also having basic information about how the data is generated. 357 00:24:58,400 --> 00:25:01,200 For example, I'm not sure. 358 00:25:01,200 --> 00:25:03,380 For me myself, I'll talk about my journey. 359 00:25:03,380 --> 00:25:10,120 When I first started just looking at the research, I started here as a fellow, I started just 360 00:25:10,120 --> 00:25:12,880 looking at the data output. 361 00:25:12,880 --> 00:25:18,360 This is how, for example, lung cancer is coded based on histology. 362 00:25:18,360 --> 00:25:22,160 This is how the patient's socio-demographic is created. 363 00:25:22,160 --> 00:25:25,720 But I did not know what happened behind the scenes. 364 00:25:25,720 --> 00:25:26,720 Why socio-dermography? 365 00:25:26,720 --> 00:25:30,720 For example, why the race is classified this way? 366 00:25:30,720 --> 00:25:34,520 Why the socioeconomic status was classified this way? 367 00:25:34,520 --> 00:25:38,560 What was behind the score that I used in my classification? 368 00:25:38,560 --> 00:25:46,800 And what are the implications of describing the socioeconomic status using this score 369 00:25:46,800 --> 00:25:48,160 versus another score? 370 00:25:48,160 --> 00:25:51,160 I was not getting into details of that. 371 00:25:51,160 --> 00:25:55,880 And I was just trying to understand the table, the Excel sheet in front of me, and maybe 372 00:25:55,880 --> 00:26:02,120 talk with the analyst to why not to look into the situation between that and that until 373 00:26:02,120 --> 00:26:08,960 I started to learn about how the data was generated, first of all. 374 00:26:08,960 --> 00:26:14,800 And the difference between using this score versus that score and how this affects the 375 00:26:14,800 --> 00:26:17,880 outcome of the analysis at the end. 376 00:26:17,880 --> 00:26:23,840 So just maybe not all the clinicians will have the chance to do a master's program in 377 00:26:23,840 --> 00:26:24,840 clinical research. 378 00:26:24,840 --> 00:26:31,480 But just having a basic or maybe listening how the data was created, was generated, is 379 00:26:31,480 --> 00:26:37,640 very helpful for them because it will affect, again, how their research question can be 380 00:26:37,640 --> 00:26:39,280 answered. 381 00:26:39,280 --> 00:26:47,840 The second thing is also to have maybe basic also knowledge about the available data analysis 382 00:26:47,840 --> 00:26:49,920 tool that are there. 383 00:26:49,920 --> 00:26:56,240 Like for example, I want to make sure that this research question can be asked using 384 00:26:56,240 --> 00:27:02,480 electronic health records because it is really different than using maybe another data set 385 00:27:02,480 --> 00:27:04,560 like claims data. 386 00:27:04,560 --> 00:27:13,400 So taking some time to understand which data source would be best for my research question 387 00:27:13,400 --> 00:27:19,760 is very important because I learned that the hard way. 388 00:27:19,760 --> 00:27:25,760 I formulated research questions for a grant proposal and I submitted my grant. 389 00:27:25,760 --> 00:27:31,360 I proposed to use actually both data, electronic health record and claims data. 390 00:27:31,360 --> 00:27:37,800 And at the end, when I received the feedback, of course, it wasn't accepted, but the feedback 391 00:27:37,800 --> 00:27:39,040 was one of them. 392 00:27:39,040 --> 00:27:44,560 This is a little bit theoretical because this kind, maybe the first question cannot be answered 393 00:27:44,560 --> 00:27:48,880 using this type of data set. 394 00:27:48,880 --> 00:27:53,600 And again, this kind of information will not be known until you talk with the people. 395 00:27:53,600 --> 00:27:58,560 It will not be known using the ABAP Med and searching for similar study that try to answer 396 00:27:58,560 --> 00:28:01,080 your research question because that's what I did. 397 00:28:01,080 --> 00:28:06,320 But just talking with the people who used both different types of data sets will help 398 00:28:06,320 --> 00:28:15,920 a lot to choose and to save you time and effort and emotions after the grant got accepted 399 00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:17,920 or whatever or rejected. 400 00:28:17,920 --> 00:28:21,120 So yeah, it's again talking with the people. 401 00:28:21,120 --> 00:28:23,960 I appreciate your comments and thank you for that. 402 00:28:23,960 --> 00:28:29,840 So what I'm hearing is that don't try to do it by yourself. 403 00:28:29,840 --> 00:28:35,480 Connect with the people who know and ask questions and don't just accept things at face value. 404 00:28:35,480 --> 00:28:37,480 I appreciate you saying that. 405 00:28:37,480 --> 00:28:41,000 And I can see that it's born out of your experience. 406 00:28:41,000 --> 00:28:44,200 You've done that before and then you've learned after the fact. 407 00:28:44,200 --> 00:28:47,240 And so what you're doing is giving people shortcuts, which is awesome. 408 00:28:47,240 --> 00:28:49,360 Yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly. 409 00:28:49,360 --> 00:28:51,400 Exactly, this is the case. 410 00:28:51,400 --> 00:28:56,040 And also my first point was that try to learn how the data was generated. 411 00:28:56,040 --> 00:29:04,400 Yes, this is very important because before I learned that, I was just like, you know, 412 00:29:04,400 --> 00:29:08,480 there was something missing in my understanding what happened. 413 00:29:08,480 --> 00:29:14,480 And sometimes I miss parts of the conversation because people who are not clinician are very 414 00:29:14,480 --> 00:29:24,440 knowledgeable about the scores and the measurements and how they can operationalize, like how 415 00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:30,400 to get a concept and make it consumable during data analysis. 416 00:29:30,400 --> 00:29:35,440 This is called operationalization of a term or of a concept. 417 00:29:35,440 --> 00:29:42,880 So this operationalization kind of thing, I think the clinician need to understand it 418 00:29:42,880 --> 00:29:49,920 because this is the transition between the idea in their heads and how it can be analyzed 419 00:29:49,920 --> 00:29:51,000 on the ground. 420 00:29:51,000 --> 00:29:52,000 I love that. 421 00:29:52,000 --> 00:29:53,520 You know what it makes me think about? 422 00:29:53,520 --> 00:29:57,600 It's like as clinicians, when we're getting data from patients, we're first of all getting 423 00:29:57,600 --> 00:30:01,000 stories and we're converting stories into data. 424 00:30:01,000 --> 00:30:04,320 When epidemiologists and biostatisticians are looking at the data, all they have is 425 00:30:04,320 --> 00:30:05,960 data without story. 426 00:30:05,960 --> 00:30:10,200 And so it's a different way of looking at it and they don't have the element of story 427 00:30:10,200 --> 00:30:11,800 to interpret things. 428 00:30:11,800 --> 00:30:17,000 And so as you say, when they're trying to operationalize race or social demographic 429 00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:23,400 information, or even diagnosis, they have to look at all these codes to come up with 430 00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:25,360 the story. 431 00:30:25,360 --> 00:30:30,320 And so being able to see how that story is being created from the data helps you, the 432 00:30:30,320 --> 00:30:32,880 clinician, because you can say, oh no, that story is not plausible. 433 00:30:32,880 --> 00:30:34,480 This is what makes more sense. 434 00:30:34,480 --> 00:30:35,800 And so I like that idea. 435 00:30:35,800 --> 00:30:39,480 Just make sure you understand how that data is being generated. 436 00:30:39,480 --> 00:30:41,040 Don't just take it at face value. 437 00:30:41,040 --> 00:30:42,040 Yes, exactly. 438 00:30:42,040 --> 00:30:43,040 Thank you so much. 439 00:30:43,040 --> 00:30:47,360 I love the description of a story and you have to listen to for different sides of the 440 00:30:47,360 --> 00:30:48,360 story. 441 00:30:48,360 --> 00:30:49,360 Yeah, I love it. 442 00:30:49,360 --> 00:30:50,360 Yeah. 443 00:30:50,360 --> 00:30:51,360 Thank you. 444 00:30:51,360 --> 00:30:52,360 That's awesome. 445 00:30:52,360 --> 00:30:53,360 Well, thank you. 446 00:30:53,360 --> 00:30:57,280 So, okay, we're coming up on the end of our podcast episode and I want you to just share 447 00:30:57,280 --> 00:31:00,720 any insights with people who are thinking, this is too hard. 448 00:31:00,720 --> 00:31:01,720 I can't do it. 449 00:31:01,720 --> 00:31:02,720 I'm just a clinician. 450 00:31:02,720 --> 00:31:04,680 I can't do research. 451 00:31:04,680 --> 00:31:08,640 What advice do you have for them and what things should they consider as they're moving 452 00:31:08,640 --> 00:31:10,640 forward in their decision? 453 00:31:10,640 --> 00:31:12,120 You are needed. 454 00:31:12,120 --> 00:31:13,800 I have to say to that to the clinician. 455 00:31:13,800 --> 00:31:15,560 You are really needed. 456 00:31:15,560 --> 00:31:20,440 No research can advance without the input from the people at the front line. 457 00:31:20,440 --> 00:31:29,520 And being a front line like heroes as clinician, really you have the responsibility, besides 458 00:31:29,520 --> 00:31:32,240 your responsibility, taking care of the patients. 459 00:31:32,240 --> 00:31:38,840 If you really have the passion for the research, because doing any work, doing any job can 460 00:31:38,840 --> 00:31:41,760 be tedious if you don't have the passion for it. 461 00:31:41,760 --> 00:31:46,680 So if you really have this question that you couldn't answer during your conversation 462 00:31:46,680 --> 00:31:50,760 with the patient and you know that the answer for this question will come from researching 463 00:31:50,760 --> 00:32:00,020 it more, you have the passion, but maybe you did not dig deeper into it. 464 00:32:00,020 --> 00:32:01,840 So just talk. 465 00:32:01,840 --> 00:32:08,640 And the need for clinician in the research, you might not need to devote big time. 466 00:32:08,640 --> 00:32:12,880 Just conversation with someone with the researcher. 467 00:32:12,880 --> 00:32:18,360 You don't know how much, like for example, me myself, I practiced for nine years and 468 00:32:18,360 --> 00:32:20,560 then I shifted into research. 469 00:32:20,560 --> 00:32:26,760 But sometimes I feel that because I practice in different setting than the US, just talking 470 00:32:26,760 --> 00:32:34,380 with clinical research or the clinician, really you can say that, illuminate me into 471 00:32:34,380 --> 00:32:41,880 how I can better tweak my or refine my question in order to fit and benefit the patient at 472 00:32:41,880 --> 00:32:43,120 the bedside. 473 00:32:43,120 --> 00:32:50,520 So clinician can really contribute to the research that is going on at different level, 474 00:32:50,520 --> 00:32:53,240 at different time, you know, requirements. 475 00:32:53,240 --> 00:32:59,640 And like I would say just to start with a small time devoted and then how it goes, maybe 476 00:32:59,640 --> 00:33:03,240 you will get into it and you'd love to continue and contribute more. 477 00:33:03,240 --> 00:33:10,320 But don't make like the time and business like a big barrier for contributing to the 478 00:33:10,320 --> 00:33:16,960 research because I am sure that every clinician at some point, whatever experience they had, 479 00:33:16,960 --> 00:33:21,560 they had unanswered questions with their patients and they are responsible. 480 00:33:21,560 --> 00:33:22,560 That's how I see it. 481 00:33:22,560 --> 00:33:25,760 We are responsible to answer this question somehow. 482 00:33:25,760 --> 00:33:34,880 And how this how can vary from few minutes talking with a researcher to maybe a few hours 483 00:33:34,880 --> 00:33:37,280 every week and so on. 484 00:33:37,280 --> 00:33:38,920 So yeah. 485 00:33:38,920 --> 00:33:39,920 That's really awesome. 486 00:33:39,920 --> 00:33:41,000 Iman, thank you so much. 487 00:33:41,000 --> 00:33:42,920 I love what you said. 488 00:33:42,920 --> 00:33:46,200 Just having passion is important and having unanswered questions. 489 00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:51,960 So for any clinician who has unanswered questions, you're already able to contribute because 490 00:33:51,960 --> 00:33:55,840 your unanswered question is the source of much research that could lead to an answer 491 00:33:55,840 --> 00:33:58,400 to the question, which is so awesome. 492 00:33:58,400 --> 00:34:01,620 And you started, you said clinicians are needed. 493 00:34:01,620 --> 00:34:03,800 We absolutely are. 494 00:34:03,800 --> 00:34:08,200 And I just want to invite as many people who are listening to just recognize that if you 495 00:34:08,200 --> 00:34:11,420 don't ask the question, nobody else may answer it. 496 00:34:11,420 --> 00:34:16,200 But you're asking the question, can precipitate others answering that you're asking the question 497 00:34:16,200 --> 00:34:18,520 may precipitate others answering that question. 498 00:34:18,520 --> 00:34:21,520 So definitely recognize that you are needed. 499 00:34:21,520 --> 00:34:24,760 Iman, you have been just such a wonderful, wonderful guest. 500 00:34:24,760 --> 00:34:29,240 I appreciate your time, your insights, and it's just been a pleasure having you on the 501 00:34:29,240 --> 00:34:30,240 show. 502 00:34:30,240 --> 00:34:31,240 Thank you for being here. 503 00:34:31,240 --> 00:34:32,240 Thank you so much, Toyosia. 504 00:34:32,240 --> 00:34:35,680 The same here really, I felt so happy and so glad. 505 00:34:35,680 --> 00:34:36,680 And thank you. 506 00:34:36,680 --> 00:34:38,080 Thank you for your exciting questions. 507 00:34:38,080 --> 00:34:39,080 It was an honor. 508 00:34:39,080 --> 00:34:40,080 Thank you. 509 00:34:40,080 --> 00:34:41,080 Thank you, Iman. 510 00:34:41,080 --> 00:34:42,080 All right, everybody. 511 00:34:42,080 --> 00:34:44,600 You've heard Dr. Metwally. 512 00:34:44,600 --> 00:34:48,620 If you're a clinician, you're absolutely needed in this research enterprise and definitely 513 00:34:48,620 --> 00:34:53,600 connect with your collaborators and really be connected as the research questions are 514 00:34:53,600 --> 00:34:54,600 being answered. 515 00:34:54,600 --> 00:34:59,200 All right, I will, I am excited to see you on the next episode. 516 00:34:59,200 --> 00:35:00,200 Thanks for joining us today. 517 00:35:00,200 --> 00:35:09,400 And I'll talk to you again the next time. 518 00:35:09,400 --> 00:35:14,760 Thanks for listening to this episode of the Clinician Researcher podcast, where academic 519 00:35:14,760 --> 00:35:20,480 clinicians learn the skills to build their own research program, whether or not they 520 00:35:20,480 --> 00:35:21,560 have a mentor. 521 00:35:21,560 --> 00:35:27,520 If you found the information in this episode to be helpful, don't keep it all to yourself. 522 00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:29,400 Someone else needs to hear it. 523 00:35:29,400 --> 00:35:33,440 So take a minute right now and share it. 524 00:35:33,440 --> 00:35:38,920 As you share this episode, you become part of our mission to help launch a new generation 525 00:35:38,920 --> 00:35:44,880 of clinician researchers who make transformative discoveries that change the way we do healthcare.

Dr. Eman Metwally Profile Photo

Dr. Eman Metwally

Physician Scientist

Dr. Eman Metwally is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. She earned her MD-PhD degree from Alexandria University in Egypt and has 2 master degrees -- Biomedical informatics and clinical research. Dr. Metwally's research interests lie at the intersection of cancer epidemiology and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Her research focuses on examining patients' sociodemographic and clinical profiles and their relationship to diagnosis, and treatment to improve patient outcomes.