The player is loading ...
Oct. 7, 2024
The MD-PhD partnership: Unleashing synergy in research
In this episode of the Clinician Researcher Podcast, Dr. Toyosi Onwuemene discusses one of the most underutilized but highly beneficial collaborations in clinical research—the partnership between MD and PhD researchers. Dr. Onwuemene, drawing from her own experiences as a clinical researcher, explains how these collaborations can drive innovation, enhance research quality, and offer unique perspectives that can break through traditional barriers in medical research.
Key Points:
- Complementary Resources and Expertise: MDs bring an abundance of clinical resources—patient access, sample collection, and clinical staff support—while PhDs offer access to research infrastructure, postdoctoral expertise, and dedicated research time. The combination creates a powerful resource pool for advancing research projects.
- Different Perspectives, Greater Synergy: While MDs focus heavily on patient care, PhDs contribute deep methodological and research expertise. Together, they offer diverse viewpoints that can lead to breakthroughs in clinical research by challenging established thinking and creating innovative solutions.
- Peer Mentoring: The MD-PhD partnership fosters a unique peer mentoring dynamic where both sides educate each other. For example, MDs can offer clinical insights, while PhDs can share advanced research methodologies. This type of collaboration creates a judgment-free environment for learning and growth.
- Interdisciplinary Grant Opportunities: Working together opens doors to a wider range of grants, including those from organizations like the NIH and FDA. Dr. Onwuemene shares her personal experience of successfully collaborating on NIH grants and plans to pursue FDA grants as well.
- Encouragement for MDs to Find PhD Collaborators: Dr. Onwuemene urges MDs to actively seek out PhD partners to help diversify and expand their research. This collaboration can lead to new ideas, improved research quality, and ultimately better patient care.
Notable Quote: "You don't get more diverse than the MD-PhD partnership. It's like two eyes coming together to see in a way that one eye can't see alone."
Call to Action: Are you an MD looking to enhance your research? Think about who the PhDs are in your professional network and reach out to collaborate! Together, you can harness the best of both worlds—clinical insight and deep research expertise.
Listener Shout-out: A special mention to Theresa, Dr. Onwuemene's collaborator, for her incredible partnership in their research projects.
Subscribe & Share: If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe to the Clinician Researcher Podcast for more insights on navigating the world of academic research. Share this episode with colleagues who could benefit.
Sponsor/Advertising/Monetization Information:
This episode is sponsored by Coag Coach LLC, a leading provider of coaching resources for clinicians transitioning to become research leaders. Coag Coach LLC is committed to supporting clinicians in their scholarship.
Looking for a coach?
Sign up for a coaching discovery call today: https://www.coagcoach.com/service-page/consultation-call-1
Transcript
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,860
Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast, where academic clinicians learn the skills
2
00:00:05,860 --> 00:00:11,260
to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.
3
00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:17,340
As clinicians, we spend a decade or more as trainees learning to take care of patients.
4
00:00:17,340 --> 00:00:22,380
When we finally start our careers, we want to build research programs, but then we find
5
00:00:22,380 --> 00:00:27,780
that our years of clinical training did not adequately prepare us to lead our research
6
00:00:27,780 --> 00:00:29,200
program.
7
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:35,480
Through no fault of our own, we struggle to find mentors, and when we can't, we quit.
8
00:00:35,480 --> 00:00:40,580
However, clinicians hold the keys to the greatest research breakthroughs.
9
00:00:40,580 --> 00:00:46,200
For this reason, the Clinician Researcher podcast exists to give academic clinicians
10
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:51,800
the tools to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.
11
00:00:51,800 --> 00:01:01,360
Now introducing your host, Toyosi Onwuemene.
12
00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:03,480
Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast.
13
00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:07,000
I'm your host, Toyosi Onwuemene, and it is an absolute pleasure to be talking with you
14
00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:08,000
today.
15
00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:09,720
Thank you so much for tuning in.
16
00:01:09,720 --> 00:01:14,000
Today I am talking about the MD and PhD partnership.
17
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:16,440
The MD and PhD partnership.
18
00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:25,040
I think that this may be one of the most overlooked and underutilized partnerships in all of clinical
19
00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:26,040
research.
20
00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:32,840
I say that because of my perspective as a newbie clinical researcher, always looking
21
00:01:32,840 --> 00:01:35,880
around at the clinicians around me.
22
00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:37,040
That was my environment.
23
00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:40,920
I was surrounded by clinicians in my division.
24
00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:41,920
Most people are clinicians.
25
00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:46,800
We do have a few PhD scientists that are within our division, but we're mostly clinical people.
26
00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:49,440
So when we gather, we're talking about the last patient.
27
00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:50,920
We're talking about the schedule.
28
00:01:50,920 --> 00:01:52,640
We're talking about call.
29
00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:55,280
We're always talking about things that are clinical.
30
00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:58,920
And then when we think about collaboration, well, we just look to each other and we say,
31
00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:00,520
hey, let's collaborate on this project.
32
00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:05,360
But the challenge is that we all kind of think the same way.
33
00:02:05,360 --> 00:02:09,320
If we didn't think the same way before we came to our faculty positions, when we've
34
00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:14,080
spent enough time together taking a call, talking about patients, attending conferences
35
00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:17,080
together, we really start to think the same way.
36
00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:21,840
And not many new things can come out of thinking exactly the same way.
37
00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:28,200
And so one of the beauties, one of the privileges of connecting with a PhD researcher is you
38
00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:34,240
suddenly are thrust into a place of new ideas or a person who has different ideas.
39
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:36,360
They don't spend all the time with patients.
40
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,340
They don't spend all that time talking about clinical stuff.
41
00:02:39,340 --> 00:02:44,840
They have different ideas and it can absolutely energize and enhance your research.
42
00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:48,600
So I want to talk about the MD and PhD partnership.
43
00:02:48,600 --> 00:02:52,960
And I hope that at the end of this, you'll think about who are the PhDs in my life.
44
00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:55,600
And I'm assuming you're MD only, you're not a PhD researcher.
45
00:02:55,600 --> 00:03:01,480
And even if you are an MD PhD, I want to let you know that you spend a lot of time thinking
46
00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:06,800
about clinical care, assuming that you have a significant clinical component.
47
00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:12,560
Even if it's just 25%, you spend a lot of time in your brain thinking about your patients.
48
00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:16,500
And so the more partnerships you have with people who don't think like you, the more
49
00:03:16,500 --> 00:03:17,500
beneficial.
50
00:03:17,500 --> 00:03:20,200
I'm going to tell you seven reasons why.
51
00:03:20,200 --> 00:03:26,840
Number one is that when you come together with a PhD scientist who is not in the clinical
52
00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:31,240
space, you have access to more resources, the two of you combined.
53
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:33,100
What do I mean by that?
54
00:03:33,100 --> 00:03:36,040
Clinical departments are geared to support clinical things.
55
00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:37,040
What does that mean?
56
00:03:37,040 --> 00:03:41,640
Well, when we're looking to hire, we're looking to hire medical assistants, we're looking
57
00:03:41,640 --> 00:03:43,640
to hire nurses.
58
00:03:43,640 --> 00:03:47,100
And honestly, the way things go in medicine, there's always a need.
59
00:03:47,100 --> 00:03:52,700
And so there is a lot of heavy focus spent in building the clinical infrastructure.
60
00:03:52,700 --> 00:03:58,200
Most clinical departments are funded by clinical dollars and therefore the priority will always
61
00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:00,820
go to the thing that funds it the most.
62
00:04:00,820 --> 00:04:04,500
And so if clinical dollars fund the priorities of the department, guess where the money's
63
00:04:04,500 --> 00:04:05,560
going to go?
64
00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:07,280
To building clinical resources.
65
00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:14,520
So you as an MD, when you come to the MD and PhD partnership, you end up having a lot of
66
00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:16,160
clinical resources.
67
00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:22,060
Yeah, your MA is probably not involved in research, but she lets you know when the patient
68
00:04:22,060 --> 00:04:25,560
is coming in who is eligible for your trial.
69
00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:29,020
Everybody in the clinic knows that the trial is open or accruing.
70
00:04:29,020 --> 00:04:35,440
And so you are able to support anything that has to do with the clinical domain when it
71
00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:36,440
comes to samples.
72
00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:37,700
Of course you can get samples.
73
00:04:37,700 --> 00:04:39,420
The patients will give you their blood.
74
00:04:39,420 --> 00:04:41,320
They give you their blood all the time.
75
00:04:41,320 --> 00:04:43,760
Of course with consent.
76
00:04:43,760 --> 00:04:49,520
But what I'm saying is that as the MD, you bring a wealth of clinical resources to the
77
00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:53,360
project that your PhD researcher likely doesn't have access to.
78
00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:54,360
Okay.
79
00:04:54,360 --> 00:04:55,360
How about the PhD?
80
00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:56,360
Okay.
81
00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:58,560
So they don't have all the patient access, but you know what?
82
00:04:58,560 --> 00:05:04,720
Their departments are largely funded by education dollars and research dollars.
83
00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:09,780
And so they have access to the postdocs who will work with you on the project.
84
00:05:09,780 --> 00:05:13,760
They have access to research infrastructure because you know what?
85
00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:16,080
When they're not teaching, they're able to do research.
86
00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:20,440
They have a lot more time and a lot more training dedicated to research than you do.
87
00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:24,320
And so a lot of the research resources, the people who know how to do qualitative interviews,
88
00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:28,480
the people who know exactly how to schedule patients, those kinds of things.
89
00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:29,920
They're all available.
90
00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:35,800
For example, we had a recent team meeting with one of our research projects and my collaborator
91
00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:38,280
is a measurement scientist.
92
00:05:38,280 --> 00:05:39,720
And that's what they do.
93
00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:42,040
They interview patients qualitatively.
94
00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:46,820
And so they have a team that'll be available to interview patients during the daytime.
95
00:05:46,820 --> 00:05:50,020
And they have a team member who's available to do the evening interviews.
96
00:05:50,020 --> 00:05:52,440
And so here we are in medicine saying, oh, I'm too busy.
97
00:05:52,440 --> 00:05:54,300
I'm not going to be able to do this time.
98
00:05:54,300 --> 00:05:58,120
And they have a team that's structured to facilitate qualitative interviews of people
99
00:05:58,120 --> 00:05:59,120
who have real life.
100
00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:00,120
Wow.
101
00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:03,560
I mean, that just feels actually, it's still a little bit overwhelming to me.
102
00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:04,560
I'm like, what?
103
00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:07,400
You have a team member who works the evening shift?
104
00:06:07,400 --> 00:06:10,000
Okay.
105
00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:14,640
My point is that there are resources that are different and they're different because
106
00:06:14,640 --> 00:06:17,000
we have different perspectives and we have different priorities.
107
00:06:17,000 --> 00:06:20,800
We have different things that we think are more important than others, right?
108
00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:28,320
And so we are optimized to have clinical care kind of be the driver of a lot of the resources
109
00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:29,640
we have.
110
00:06:29,640 --> 00:06:33,840
And they are optimized to have research and education be the driver of a lot of the resources
111
00:06:33,840 --> 00:06:34,840
they have.
112
00:06:34,840 --> 00:06:38,880
And when you bring that together in partnership, that's synergy because you can bring together
113
00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,960
a lot of clinical resources and they can bring together a lot of research resources.
114
00:06:41,960 --> 00:06:43,200
So it's really awesome.
115
00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:44,200
Okay.
116
00:06:44,200 --> 00:06:46,240
Access to a broader research pool.
117
00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:47,240
That's number one.
118
00:06:47,240 --> 00:06:50,280
Number two is complementary expertise.
119
00:06:50,280 --> 00:06:54,240
What I said at the beginning, your MD brain is thinking about patients a lot.
120
00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:56,920
You're thinking about that case that you can't crack.
121
00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:01,260
And then you gather together with your colleagues and you start talking about the case and somebody
122
00:07:01,260 --> 00:07:02,720
else has another case.
123
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:07,320
Similarly, you get to conferences, you're mostly talking about clinical cases.
124
00:07:07,320 --> 00:07:12,960
You're always in the clinical perspective, which is excellent because hey, everything
125
00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:17,160
we do in research is with the end goal of serving patients.
126
00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:23,120
And the people who are focused on flies, who are focused on worms, at the end of all of
127
00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:27,640
these discoveries is to serve patient care, is to serve patients.
128
00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:34,120
And so your very largely patient focused perspective is so important and it's not enough.
129
00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:39,760
And so the PhD researcher comes with deep methodologic expertise.
130
00:07:39,760 --> 00:07:44,200
I don't care how much time you spent doing research in your fellowship, or maybe you
131
00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:45,680
even went and got a PhD.
132
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:51,640
You have not spent nearly as much time as a PhD researcher has spent thinking about
133
00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:53,360
and conducting research.
134
00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:56,800
I will meet a lot of MD PhDs who said, well, I spent the same amount of time.
135
00:07:56,800 --> 00:07:58,680
And it's like, no, it's not the same.
136
00:07:58,680 --> 00:08:02,360
It's not the same when you were in your clinical space for a couple of years and then you came
137
00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:04,960
out and you went back to your PhD and you came out and went back.
138
00:08:04,960 --> 00:08:06,120
It's different.
139
00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:07,240
It is different.
140
00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:11,080
And it's not saying that you're any less qualified because I also get that too, where some of
141
00:08:11,080 --> 00:08:13,600
my MD PhDs would be like, I'm not less qualified.
142
00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:14,600
And I get that.
143
00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:20,080
But it's a pain point where sometimes you feel like you're inferior because as the MD,
144
00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:22,640
you come to the clinical space and people are like, oh, you've been in the lab for the
145
00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:23,640
last three years.
146
00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:24,640
What do you know?
147
00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:27,520
And then you go to the PhD space and then they're like, eh, you're always in the clinic.
148
00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:28,520
What do you know?
149
00:08:28,520 --> 00:08:30,720
And so there's this feeling of where do I belong?
150
00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:34,640
And I get that from my MD PhDs and I just want to honor that.
151
00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:39,640
And I also want to say that you have a different perspective that a PhD scientist doesn't have
152
00:08:39,640 --> 00:08:41,240
and an MD scientist doesn't have.
153
00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:42,560
You have a unique perspective.
154
00:08:42,560 --> 00:08:43,600
So celebrate that.
155
00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:45,280
You're not like everybody else.
156
00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:46,280
You're unique.
157
00:08:46,280 --> 00:08:52,480
But the reality is, and when we look at PhD researchers, they've had more time, more focused
158
00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:58,940
time over time invested in research in a way that MDs have not had the luxury of having.
159
00:08:58,940 --> 00:09:05,480
And so when you bring down, bring together your expertise in mostly clinical care, even
160
00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:10,320
if you have an MD PhD and you have research experience, a PhD scientist is bringing a
161
00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:12,000
totally different perspective.
162
00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:16,760
They don't have the clinical perspective, but their expertise is deep in a certain area
163
00:09:16,760 --> 00:09:17,760
of research.
164
00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:20,680
Their methodologic expertise is big.
165
00:09:20,680 --> 00:09:24,920
And they have a team that has complementary expertise as well.
166
00:09:24,920 --> 00:09:28,180
They're working with a postdoc who also has expertise in this area.
167
00:09:28,180 --> 00:09:33,440
You bring your team together and their team together and it's a powerful synergy.
168
00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:37,480
So the second benefit is complementary expertise.
169
00:09:37,480 --> 00:09:40,920
The third benefit is that you're bringing diverse perspectives.
170
00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:45,000
And I don't have to go into this for too long because that kind of speaks to the things
171
00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:47,200
I've talked about earlier.
172
00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:50,840
You are very clear on how the patient can be helped.
173
00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:53,040
You're very clear on the definition of the disease.
174
00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:56,360
You're very clear on who's an affected individual, who's not.
175
00:09:56,360 --> 00:09:57,440
You know all these things.
176
00:09:57,440 --> 00:09:59,200
You take them for granted.
177
00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:02,480
You have no idea that nobody else is thinking like you.
178
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:08,260
For example, one of my great colleagues and friends, we write together and we have a project
179
00:10:08,260 --> 00:10:15,040
that we're doing together and we are focused on a disease called TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic
180
00:10:15,040 --> 00:10:17,480
perfora, for those of you who remember.
181
00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:19,840
And TTP is not ITP.
182
00:10:19,840 --> 00:10:24,840
So there's some confusion in the literature where people want to say immune TTP is ITTP,
183
00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:28,480
which is so confusing because immune thrombocytopenia is ITP.
184
00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:30,560
I mean, whose idea is this?
185
00:10:30,560 --> 00:10:33,500
Okay, I'm going to get off that box right now.
186
00:10:33,500 --> 00:10:36,080
But it's confusing to the best of us.
187
00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:41,360
And so if we're paying attention as clinicians, we're like, of course, ITTP is not ITP.
188
00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:43,760
My colleague has no idea.
189
00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:50,280
She has no idea that we're confused enough to use the same kind of three letters to describe
190
00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:53,760
two different diseases that are very similar.
191
00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:57,680
Why would I think a thrombocytopenic disease that's ITTP is different from a thrombocytopenic
192
00:10:57,680 --> 00:10:58,680
disease that's ITP?
193
00:10:58,680 --> 00:11:01,000
Why wouldn't we just call it a different name?
194
00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:05,840
Okay, I'm going to come back down because that does irk me.
195
00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:06,840
This is really confusing.
196
00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:09,120
I know as a hematologist, I will never be confused.
197
00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:13,560
I know ITP is ITTP, but you know, if it was just hematologists reading the literature,
198
00:11:13,560 --> 00:11:16,640
then yes, call it whatever you want.
199
00:11:16,640 --> 00:11:20,180
But anyway, I digress.
200
00:11:20,180 --> 00:11:24,600
But when my PhD scientist goes looking in the literature, she comes back with papers
201
00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:26,800
who have that and they're all talking about ITP.
202
00:11:26,800 --> 00:11:28,760
And she's like, oh my gosh, this is so exciting.
203
00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:34,600
In fact, I've seen published papers where people are talking about ITTP and they're
204
00:11:34,600 --> 00:11:37,360
actually they have a cohort of patients who have ITP.
205
00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:39,440
So they're like, oh my gosh, bleeding is increasing this population.
206
00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:41,780
I'm like, but this is the wrong population.
207
00:11:41,780 --> 00:11:44,140
Who was your partner?
208
00:11:44,140 --> 00:11:45,760
So we come with diverse perspectives.
209
00:11:45,760 --> 00:11:50,280
So in clinical things, as an MD, you know, you know the deal.
210
00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:52,560
You would never be confused that ITTP is ITP.
211
00:11:52,560 --> 00:11:54,520
You would never be confused.
212
00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:57,040
The PhD scientist doesn't think about anything clinical.
213
00:11:57,040 --> 00:12:00,880
In fact, they know methodology inside and out.
214
00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:05,760
And they would never be confused about certain assays or certain experimental methods.
215
00:12:05,760 --> 00:12:10,280
For example, yesterday I was in a meeting with two biostatisticians and they were speaking
216
00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:12,040
and I literally was doing this.
217
00:12:12,040 --> 00:12:15,760
Like, OK, if you're listening to me, I was like my head would turn to the left and then
218
00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:18,000
I would turn to the right and then I would look at the person on the left and I would
219
00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:21,880
look at the person on the right and I would be like, holy cow, I don't understand what
220
00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:26,640
you're saying because when they get together, they speak a different language.
221
00:12:26,640 --> 00:12:31,880
And they have totally different perspective from me and it's so beautiful because when
222
00:12:31,880 --> 00:12:37,120
they start flying off into biostatistical heaven, I pull them back down and I say, hey,
223
00:12:37,120 --> 00:12:41,560
the problem we're solving is here on Earth.
224
00:12:41,560 --> 00:12:43,200
It is so beautiful.
225
00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:49,200
But they have diverse perspectives that really come together and give us like a brand new
226
00:12:49,200 --> 00:12:51,400
view of the problem.
227
00:12:51,400 --> 00:12:56,800
And so here, it's kind of like two eyes coming together to see in a way that one eye can't
228
00:12:56,800 --> 00:12:57,800
see alone.
229
00:12:57,800 --> 00:13:02,440
It's like you have the peripheral vision and it just comes together and it gives you compound
230
00:13:02,440 --> 00:13:09,760
vision in a way that one eye, which is doing great by itself, can't do except when two
231
00:13:09,760 --> 00:13:14,540
eyes come together and then they're really able to give you a really great perspective.
232
00:13:14,540 --> 00:13:17,720
You can see all sides, all sorts of things.
233
00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:23,960
And so diverse perspectives are so important and you don't get more diverse than the MD-PhD
234
00:13:23,960 --> 00:13:24,960
partnership.
235
00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:29,280
Now, you think you're diverse when you jump from hematology, you'll meet a pathologist
236
00:13:29,280 --> 00:13:33,840
at some diversity, but it's still a very deep clinical orientation.
237
00:13:33,840 --> 00:13:41,440
So diversify your clinical team, yes, but especially diversify your research team with
238
00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:44,680
deep PhD methodologic expertise.
239
00:13:44,680 --> 00:13:45,680
Okay.
240
00:13:45,680 --> 00:13:50,040
Oh, one of the things, one of the ones I'm most excited about is number four.
241
00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:53,360
Can you tell I'm so excited?
242
00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:54,760
It's about peer mentoring.
243
00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:56,400
It is about peer mentoring.
244
00:13:56,400 --> 00:14:00,320
It's about the fact that the two of you come together, you start finding out that you think
245
00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:05,800
differently about things, you know different things, and now you can educate each other.
246
00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:11,400
For example, when my PhD scientist collaborator comes to me with an ITP document and she's
247
00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:16,920
so excited about what she's learned, I can educate her about the difference between ITP
248
00:14:16,920 --> 00:14:18,560
and ITTP.
249
00:14:18,560 --> 00:14:23,760
I can do that very easily and not in a judgmental way because we're colleagues.
250
00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:31,080
And when I say, oh, this is not, this instrument is not valid, she can gently correct me and
251
00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:35,840
say, well, what we say is that there is no validity evidence.
252
00:14:35,840 --> 00:14:37,920
You know, that just doesn't feel as powerful.
253
00:14:37,920 --> 00:14:38,920
It's not valid.
254
00:14:38,920 --> 00:14:41,720
It feels more powerful than there's no validity evidence.
255
00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:44,840
So I'm always, it took me a long time to move away from this.
256
00:14:44,840 --> 00:14:48,280
These instruments are not now, but it's great.
257
00:14:48,280 --> 00:14:50,080
It's great peer mentoring because I'm learning.
258
00:14:50,080 --> 00:14:51,080
I'm learning.
259
00:14:51,080 --> 00:14:55,280
I have never taken a qualitative research methods course and perhaps I should, but I
260
00:14:55,280 --> 00:14:56,280
haven't.
261
00:14:56,280 --> 00:15:00,160
I'm working with somebody who's an expert in qualitative methods.
262
00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:05,880
This person teaches qualitative methods and I learned so much just by being around her.
263
00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:07,680
I don't even have to audit her class.
264
00:15:07,680 --> 00:15:09,880
I can just be around her and learn so much.
265
00:15:09,880 --> 00:15:13,700
And she can be around me and learn so much about clinical things.
266
00:15:13,700 --> 00:15:16,720
And so it's a beautiful peer mentoring that happens as well.
267
00:15:16,720 --> 00:15:21,560
When we write grants, the way we write, I write and then she's like, well, you know,
268
00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:25,620
you couldn't, you wouldn't really say it this way because they speak a whole different language
269
00:15:25,620 --> 00:15:26,840
than I do.
270
00:15:26,840 --> 00:15:31,660
And similarly when she writes it, I say, oh, clinically we would not do this.
271
00:15:31,660 --> 00:15:34,360
When we say, oh, these are the end points we're going to measure, I would say, clinically
272
00:15:34,360 --> 00:15:35,920
these are not meaningful.
273
00:15:35,920 --> 00:15:40,720
And so we're mentoring each other and it's so powerful, so powerful because on the one
274
00:15:40,720 --> 00:15:46,600
hand when you're thinking about your mentor mentoring you, it's a hierarchical relationship.
275
00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:49,320
And there are some things you're afraid to ask about because you feel like you should
276
00:15:49,320 --> 00:15:50,860
already know them.
277
00:15:50,860 --> 00:15:56,120
And sometimes you ask and your mentor looks at you saying like, you don't know that?
278
00:15:56,120 --> 00:15:59,620
And even when they're trying to be, they try to be nonjudgmental, you feel the hierarchy
279
00:15:59,620 --> 00:16:00,880
of their position.
280
00:16:00,880 --> 00:16:03,720
You feel it because medicine is so hierarchical.
281
00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:08,840
And so when you work with a collaborator, a PhD scientist who's maybe at your level,
282
00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:11,720
and even if they're not, you're learning from each other.
283
00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:14,800
It's a beautiful peer mentoring relationship.
284
00:16:14,800 --> 00:16:16,040
That's powerful.
285
00:16:16,040 --> 00:16:17,080
You're both learning.
286
00:16:17,080 --> 00:16:18,200
It's nonjudgmental.
287
00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:19,280
You're advancing.
288
00:16:19,280 --> 00:16:21,640
It makes your experience fun.
289
00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:27,480
So yes, number four is my favorite one is that peer mentoring happens because you're
290
00:16:27,480 --> 00:16:29,120
coming from different disciplines.
291
00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:33,160
And if you're going to be able to work together, you have to speak the same language and you
292
00:16:33,160 --> 00:16:35,800
both can come together to do that.
293
00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:41,560
Number five is that you also get access to interdisciplinary grant opportunities.
294
00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:45,240
So when me and my collaborator came together, I'm going to shout her out because sometimes
295
00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:47,200
she listens to this podcast.
296
00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:49,200
Hey, Theresa.
297
00:16:49,200 --> 00:16:52,340
When we come together, we have different grant opportunities.
298
00:16:52,340 --> 00:16:58,280
So my collaborator will say, hey, I have a lot of experience writing grants and being
299
00:16:58,280 --> 00:17:00,000
successful with FDA.
300
00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:04,200
I don't have as much experience in writing grants and being successful with NIH.
301
00:17:04,200 --> 00:17:07,960
And at the time, I actually didn't have experience being successful with grants with NIH, but
302
00:17:07,960 --> 00:17:12,200
we came together and we wrote a grant for NIH and we were successful.
303
00:17:12,200 --> 00:17:15,240
And we're going to come together, we're going to write a grant for FDA, and we're going
304
00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:16,240
to be successful.
305
00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:22,720
You know, we both have different opportunities and interdisciplinary opportunities come together
306
00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:24,480
when we come together to write grants.
307
00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:28,920
And so it's a really beautiful opportunity to now expand the bucket where you literally
308
00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:33,280
have the three grants in your society that everyone applies for.
309
00:17:33,280 --> 00:17:37,840
You can now really expand the pie and now you can apply for grants that only PhDs apply
310
00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:40,880
to, but you are collaborators together.
311
00:17:40,880 --> 00:17:45,440
So there's the part for you as the MD and there's the part for you as the PhD.
312
00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:52,280
And so you have access to more funding opportunities than you do if you're going it alone with
313
00:17:52,280 --> 00:17:54,680
just you and your clinical team.
314
00:17:54,680 --> 00:17:56,560
It is a beautiful thing.
315
00:17:56,560 --> 00:17:59,160
Your wealth is involved in this partnership.
316
00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:05,840
If I haven't sold you on this partnership by now, I feel like I will get you.
317
00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:07,960
I have two more things to talk about.
318
00:18:07,960 --> 00:18:16,000
Number six is that when you write grants together, there is powerful synergy.
319
00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:18,000
There is powerful synergy.
320
00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:23,960
So I will tell you that one of the most fun experiences, oh my goodness, that I've ever
321
00:18:23,960 --> 00:18:28,640
had writing grants was writing a grant with my PhD collaborator.
322
00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:34,920
It was so fun because one, we both owned the grant and we both really came at it with diverse
323
00:18:34,920 --> 00:18:37,520
perspectives and complementary expertise.
324
00:18:37,520 --> 00:18:42,120
Now when it comes to background and significance, I own the grant.
325
00:18:42,120 --> 00:18:48,920
And I say that not bragging, with humility, but just saying that I understand where this
326
00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:51,600
applies to patients because I think about patients a lot.
327
00:18:51,600 --> 00:18:57,400
I certainly think about patients a lot more compared to my PhD scientist collaborator.
328
00:18:57,400 --> 00:19:02,400
And she knows how it can help people, but not to the extent to which I know because
329
00:19:02,400 --> 00:19:05,720
I've been thinking about clinical medicine for over 20 years.
330
00:19:05,720 --> 00:19:10,680
So yeah, I can write the background and significance and really relate it to patients really well.
331
00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:12,520
And it doesn't mean she can't do that.
332
00:19:12,520 --> 00:19:14,200
It just means that it's easier for me to do.
333
00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:17,720
So I will take the background significance first and I'll write it.
334
00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:20,720
And she, oh my goodness, she's king when it comes to methodology.
335
00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:25,080
I mean, I have an idea and sometimes I've put together some nice paragraphs with methodology.
336
00:19:25,080 --> 00:19:28,240
But to be honest, she's so much better than me.
337
00:19:28,240 --> 00:19:29,240
She's faster.
338
00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:31,120
She's just, wow, she's good.
339
00:19:31,120 --> 00:19:32,920
She's really good.
340
00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:34,320
And so we divide and conquer the grant.
341
00:19:34,320 --> 00:19:36,720
I say, I'm going to write the background significance first.
342
00:19:36,720 --> 00:19:39,720
You focus on the approach and then we're going to switch.
343
00:19:39,720 --> 00:19:44,560
Because now when I go back to like revising the approach, I revise from my clinical perspective.
344
00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:49,320
And when she goes to revise the background significance, she's revising from her PhD
345
00:19:49,320 --> 00:19:51,600
methodology expertise.
346
00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:54,040
And so it is powerful synergy.
347
00:19:54,040 --> 00:19:56,640
I mean, we write great grants together.
348
00:19:56,640 --> 00:19:59,920
And so I remember the first time we wrote a grant together.
349
00:19:59,920 --> 00:20:02,400
And I mean, it was just such a powerful experience.
350
00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:04,560
And I knew, I'm like, this is a good grant.
351
00:20:04,560 --> 00:20:05,720
We both felt that way.
352
00:20:05,720 --> 00:20:07,720
Like, this is a great grant.
353
00:20:07,720 --> 00:20:11,480
And I have to tell you, I got on a plane and there was the worst kind of turbulence.
354
00:20:11,480 --> 00:20:12,920
I mean, there was someone screaming on the plane.
355
00:20:12,920 --> 00:20:14,400
That's how bad the turbulence was.
356
00:20:14,400 --> 00:20:15,400
It was turbulent.
357
00:20:15,400 --> 00:20:20,480
And I remember thinking, I was like, this plane is not going to go down because we just
358
00:20:20,480 --> 00:20:23,480
wrote a great grant.
359
00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:28,080
That's how much confidence I had in the grant.
360
00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:30,000
I mean, the confidence is not in the grant.
361
00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:33,200
But just I was like, I had such a sense of purpose about the grant.
362
00:20:33,200 --> 00:20:36,800
Like the work we were going to do felt so powerful.
363
00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:39,400
I knew there was no way I was going to die before doing that work.
364
00:20:39,400 --> 00:20:41,720
I was like, nope, I'm not crashing in this plane.
365
00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:43,760
I know that for a fact.
366
00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:46,440
And it came from the powerful synergy we had of writing the grant.
367
00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:49,920
I would tell you, even if I got on the plane that day, I was the last person on the plane
368
00:20:49,920 --> 00:20:54,280
because I was putting some finishing touches to like one of the pages of the grant.
369
00:20:54,280 --> 00:20:59,560
And I was like, I'm going to finish this page before I get on the plane.
370
00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:02,240
It was such a synergistic grant writing experience.
371
00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:04,560
It absolutely was.
372
00:21:04,560 --> 00:21:09,960
And I do want to pause and say that you have to find the right person.
373
00:21:09,960 --> 00:21:13,720
This is not like, oh, every PhD scientist I write with is going to be a powerful, you
374
00:21:13,720 --> 00:21:14,720
know, powerful experience.
375
00:21:14,720 --> 00:21:19,200
I've written with other PhD scientists where they literally were like, you're on your own.
376
00:21:19,200 --> 00:21:20,200
Good luck.
377
00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:23,040
Show me the grant and I'll help you edit it.
378
00:21:23,040 --> 00:21:26,520
This was really two of us coming together to really write something that was synergistic.
379
00:21:26,520 --> 00:21:30,160
And so it has to be mutual commitment.
380
00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:34,400
You don't just find someone off the street and say, well, write with me.
381
00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:35,560
There's relationship building.
382
00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:36,560
There's chemistry.
383
00:21:36,560 --> 00:21:38,280
That is important.
384
00:21:38,280 --> 00:21:44,280
But it really is a powerful synergy when two people who are like-minded, but from different
385
00:21:44,280 --> 00:21:46,920
perspectives come together to create something.
386
00:21:46,920 --> 00:21:48,880
It's really a powerful synergy.
387
00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:51,480
Finally, increased productivity.
388
00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:52,480
Increased productivity.
389
00:21:52,480 --> 00:21:56,760
You know, this one probably doesn't need too much explanation.
390
00:21:56,760 --> 00:21:58,840
You both have different perspectives.
391
00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:00,400
You can submit to different journals.
392
00:22:00,400 --> 00:22:04,400
For example, we have manuscript and we're like, should we submit to a qualitative research
393
00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:06,960
focused journal, health services focused journal?
394
00:22:06,960 --> 00:22:12,280
Or should we submit to a hematology focused journal?
395
00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:13,280
We have options.
396
00:22:13,280 --> 00:22:16,160
And so, yeah, we can do that.
397
00:22:16,160 --> 00:22:20,160
And for example, we're thinking about a project that we're working on together and we're like,
398
00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:23,240
okay, well, why don't we lay out what the landscape should look like?
399
00:22:23,240 --> 00:22:28,640
How about we just write a paper that describes why it's important for us to do the work we're
400
00:22:28,640 --> 00:22:29,640
doing?
401
00:22:29,640 --> 00:22:31,720
Let's lay the foundation for why our work is important.
402
00:22:31,720 --> 00:22:35,600
I mean, we did that in the grant anyway, so why not just write the paper out of it?
403
00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:38,240
And then as we're starting to work, we're like, wait a minute, why don't we publish
404
00:22:38,240 --> 00:22:39,240
our protocol?
405
00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:41,300
Wow, there's another manuscript, right?
406
00:22:41,300 --> 00:22:43,920
And I'm working on some manuscripts, she's working on other manuscripts.
407
00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:46,680
It really allows us to be super productive.
408
00:22:46,680 --> 00:22:50,080
And then we have different avenues that we can send our work to.
409
00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:54,080
And so it's a really powerful, powerful, powerful experience.
410
00:22:54,080 --> 00:22:56,800
Okay, so I shared seven things.
411
00:22:56,800 --> 00:22:57,800
I shared seven things.
412
00:22:57,800 --> 00:22:59,520
I want to summarize them.
413
00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:02,880
Access to border resource pool.
414
00:23:02,880 --> 00:23:05,800
You get access to a broader resource pool.
415
00:23:05,800 --> 00:23:09,800
You have complementary expertise, diverse perspectives.
416
00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:11,800
You can mentor each other, so peer mentoring.
417
00:23:11,800 --> 00:23:15,080
You have interdisciplinary grant writing opportunities.
418
00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:20,200
You have synergistic grant writing, and you have increased productivity.
419
00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:26,920
So if you are an MD researcher, even if you're MD PhD, and you're like, oh, I don't really
420
00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:31,040
have any PhD scientists in my collaboration pool.
421
00:23:31,040 --> 00:23:36,880
I want you to think about who is like you, similarly looking for opportunities.
422
00:23:36,880 --> 00:23:40,360
Many times we're looking for the senior mentors just to give us the light of day.
423
00:23:40,360 --> 00:23:43,280
And in reality, they're so full, they don't care about us, right?
424
00:23:43,280 --> 00:23:44,280
They're not hungry.
425
00:23:44,280 --> 00:23:47,200
But there are people who are on the same level as you.
426
00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:51,000
They are early career, and they are hungry for collaborators.
427
00:23:51,000 --> 00:23:55,320
And you are an expert person that they can partner with.
428
00:23:55,320 --> 00:23:57,480
Yes, you don't have all the resources.
429
00:23:57,480 --> 00:24:00,200
Yes, you don't have all the opportunities.
430
00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:05,320
But wow, when two of you come together, you can really create something amazing.
431
00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:07,360
So who might you partner with?
432
00:24:07,360 --> 00:24:11,720
I want to invite you to think about your PhD friends, or at least somebody who can link
433
00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:16,740
you to a PhD colleague who has complementary expertise.
434
00:24:16,740 --> 00:24:20,200
And see if you reach out to them and set up a meeting, just this week.
435
00:24:20,200 --> 00:24:24,600
Set up a meeting and talk, see what's possible.
436
00:24:24,600 --> 00:24:27,080
And I'd love to hear about how the conversation went.
437
00:24:27,080 --> 00:24:31,440
And it may be that it goes well, and you start thinking about a collaboration, or it may
438
00:24:31,440 --> 00:24:33,880
be that it doesn't go well.
439
00:24:33,880 --> 00:24:39,200
But at least you are working to expand your networks and to create the kind of synergy
440
00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:40,920
that allows you to really go far.
441
00:24:40,920 --> 00:24:41,920
All right.
442
00:24:41,920 --> 00:24:44,000
It's been a pleasure talking with you today.
443
00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:49,000
As always, if you're looking for a coach, I'm happy to support you in that process.
444
00:24:49,000 --> 00:24:54,880
And I want you to succeed, because we need more clinicians winning in research.
445
00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:57,520
And it's so hard, because we're not set up to do it.
446
00:24:57,520 --> 00:25:01,080
Our clinical departments, even though they tell us they want to do research, they don't
447
00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:02,800
really support us to do it.
448
00:25:02,800 --> 00:25:06,380
And so it takes time, it takes effort, it takes energy.
449
00:25:06,380 --> 00:25:08,080
And I would love to see you win.
450
00:25:08,080 --> 00:25:09,080
All right.
451
00:25:09,080 --> 00:25:13,560
Until next time, I look forward to talking with you again on the Clinician Researcher
452
00:25:13,560 --> 00:25:14,560
podcast.
453
00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:15,560
Have a great day.
454
00:25:15,560 --> 00:25:16,560
Thanks for listening to this episode of the Clinician Researcher podcast.
455
00:25:16,560 --> 00:25:31,760
Where academic clinicians learn the skills to build their own research program, whether
456
00:25:31,760 --> 00:25:34,160
or not they have a mentor.
457
00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:40,280
If you found the information in this episode to be helpful, don't keep it all to yourself.
458
00:25:40,280 --> 00:25:42,040
Someone else needs to hear it.
459
00:25:42,040 --> 00:25:46,080
So take a minute right now and share it.
460
00:25:46,080 --> 00:25:51,520
As you share this episode, you become part of our mission to help launch a new generation
461
00:25:51,520 --> 00:26:20,080
of clinician researchers who make transformative discoveries that change the way we do healthcare.
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,860
Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast, where academic clinicians learn the skills
2
00:00:05,860 --> 00:00:11,260
to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.
3
00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:17,340
As clinicians, we spend a decade or more as trainees learning to take care of patients.
4
00:00:17,340 --> 00:00:22,380
When we finally start our careers, we want to build research programs, but then we find
5
00:00:22,380 --> 00:00:27,780
that our years of clinical training did not adequately prepare us to lead our research
6
00:00:27,780 --> 00:00:29,200
program.
7
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:35,480
Through no fault of our own, we struggle to find mentors, and when we can't, we quit.
8
00:00:35,480 --> 00:00:40,580
However, clinicians hold the keys to the greatest research breakthroughs.
9
00:00:40,580 --> 00:00:46,200
For this reason, the Clinician Researcher podcast exists to give academic clinicians
10
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:51,800
the tools to build their own research program, whether or not they have a mentor.
11
00:00:51,800 --> 00:01:01,360
Now introducing your host, Toyosi Onwuemene.
12
00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:03,480
Welcome to the Clinician Researcher podcast.
13
00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:07,000
I'm your host, Toyosi Onwuemene, and it is an absolute pleasure to be talking with you
14
00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:08,000
today.
15
00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:09,720
Thank you so much for tuning in.
16
00:01:09,720 --> 00:01:14,000
Today I am talking about the MD and PhD partnership.
17
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:16,440
The MD and PhD partnership.
18
00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:25,040
I think that this may be one of the most overlooked and underutilized partnerships in all of clinical
19
00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:26,040
research.
20
00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:32,840
I say that because of my perspective as a newbie clinical researcher, always looking
21
00:01:32,840 --> 00:01:35,880
around at the clinicians around me.
22
00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:37,040
That was my environment.
23
00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:40,920
I was surrounded by clinicians in my division.
24
00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:41,920
Most people are clinicians.
25
00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:46,800
We do have a few PhD scientists that are within our division, but we're mostly clinical people.
26
00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:49,440
So when we gather, we're talking about the last patient.
27
00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:50,920
We're talking about the schedule.
28
00:01:50,920 --> 00:01:52,640
We're talking about call.
29
00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:55,280
We're always talking about things that are clinical.
30
00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:58,920
And then when we think about collaboration, well, we just look to each other and we say,
31
00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:00,520
hey, let's collaborate on this project.
32
00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:05,360
But the challenge is that we all kind of think the same way.
33
00:02:05,360 --> 00:02:09,320
If we didn't think the same way before we came to our faculty positions, when we've
34
00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:14,080
spent enough time together taking a call, talking about patients, attending conferences
35
00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:17,080
together, we really start to think the same way.
36
00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:21,840
And not many new things can come out of thinking exactly the same way.
37
00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:28,200
And so one of the beauties, one of the privileges of connecting with a PhD researcher is you
38
00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:34,240
suddenly are thrust into a place of new ideas or a person who has different ideas.
39
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:36,360
They don't spend all the time with patients.
40
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,340
They don't spend all that time talking about clinical stuff.
41
00:02:39,340 --> 00:02:44,840
They have different ideas and it can absolutely energize and enhance your research.
42
00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:48,600
So I want to talk about the MD and PhD partnership.
43
00:02:48,600 --> 00:02:52,960
And I hope that at the end of this, you'll think about who are the PhDs in my life.
44
00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:55,600
And I'm assuming you're MD only, you're not a PhD researcher.
45
00:02:55,600 --> 00:03:01,480
And even if you are an MD PhD, I want to let you know that you spend a lot of time thinking
46
00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:06,800
about clinical care, assuming that you have a significant clinical component.
47
00:03:06,800 --> 00:03:12,560
Even if it's just 25%, you spend a lot of time in your brain thinking about your patients.
48
00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:16,500
And so the more partnerships you have with people who don't think like you, the more
49
00:03:16,500 --> 00:03:17,500
beneficial.
50
00:03:17,500 --> 00:03:20,200
I'm going to tell you seven reasons why.
51
00:03:20,200 --> 00:03:26,840
Number one is that when you come together with a PhD scientist who is not in the clinical
52
00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:31,240
space, you have access to more resources, the two of you combined.
53
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:33,100
What do I mean by that?
54
00:03:33,100 --> 00:03:36,040
Clinical departments are geared to support clinical things.
55
00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:37,040
What does that mean?
56
00:03:37,040 --> 00:03:41,640
Well, when we're looking to hire, we're looking to hire medical assistants, we're looking
57
00:03:41,640 --> 00:03:43,640
to hire nurses.
58
00:03:43,640 --> 00:03:47,100
And honestly, the way things go in medicine, there's always a need.
59
00:03:47,100 --> 00:03:52,700
And so there is a lot of heavy focus spent in building the clinical infrastructure.
60
00:03:52,700 --> 00:03:58,200
Most clinical departments are funded by clinical dollars and therefore the priority will always
61
00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:00,820
go to the thing that funds it the most.
62
00:04:00,820 --> 00:04:04,500
And so if clinical dollars fund the priorities of the department, guess where the money's
63
00:04:04,500 --> 00:04:05,560
going to go?
64
00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:07,280
To building clinical resources.
65
00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:14,520
So you as an MD, when you come to the MD and PhD partnership, you end up having a lot of
66
00:04:14,520 --> 00:04:16,160
clinical resources.
67
00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:22,060
Yeah, your MA is probably not involved in research, but she lets you know when the patient
68
00:04:22,060 --> 00:04:25,560
is coming in who is eligible for your trial.
69
00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:29,020
Everybody in the clinic knows that the trial is open or accruing.
70
00:04:29,020 --> 00:04:35,440
And so you are able to support anything that has to do with the clinical domain when it
71
00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:36,440
comes to samples.
72
00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:37,700
Of course you can get samples.
73
00:04:37,700 --> 00:04:39,420
The patients will give you their blood.
74
00:04:39,420 --> 00:04:41,320
They give you their blood all the time.
75
00:04:41,320 --> 00:04:43,760
Of course with consent.
76
00:04:43,760 --> 00:04:49,520
But what I'm saying is that as the MD, you bring a wealth of clinical resources to the
77
00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:53,360
project that your PhD researcher likely doesn't have access to.
78
00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:54,360
Okay.
79
00:04:54,360 --> 00:04:55,360
How about the PhD?
80
00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:56,360
Okay.
81
00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:58,560
So they don't have all the patient access, but you know what?
82
00:04:58,560 --> 00:05:04,720
Their departments are largely funded by education dollars and research dollars.
83
00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:09,780
And so they have access to the postdocs who will work with you on the project.
84
00:05:09,780 --> 00:05:13,760
They have access to research infrastructure because you know what?
85
00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:16,080
When they're not teaching, they're able to do research.
86
00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:20,440
They have a lot more time and a lot more training dedicated to research than you do.
87
00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:24,320
And so a lot of the research resources, the people who know how to do qualitative interviews,
88
00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:28,480
the people who know exactly how to schedule patients, those kinds of things.
89
00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:29,920
They're all available.
90
00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:35,800
For example, we had a recent team meeting with one of our research projects and my collaborator
91
00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:38,280
is a measurement scientist.
92
00:05:38,280 --> 00:05:39,720
And that's what they do.
93
00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:42,040
They interview patients qualitatively.
94
00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:46,820
And so they have a team that'll be available to interview patients during the daytime.
95
00:05:46,820 --> 00:05:50,020
And they have a team member who's available to do the evening interviews.
96
00:05:50,020 --> 00:05:52,440
And so here we are in medicine saying, oh, I'm too busy.
97
00:05:52,440 --> 00:05:54,300
I'm not going to be able to do this time.
98
00:05:54,300 --> 00:05:58,120
And they have a team that's structured to facilitate qualitative interviews of people
99
00:05:58,120 --> 00:05:59,120
who have real life.
100
00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:00,120
Wow.
101
00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:03,560
I mean, that just feels actually, it's still a little bit overwhelming to me.
102
00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:04,560
I'm like, what?
103
00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:07,400
You have a team member who works the evening shift?
104
00:06:07,400 --> 00:06:10,000
Okay.
105
00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:14,640
My point is that there are resources that are different and they're different because
106
00:06:14,640 --> 00:06:17,000
we have different perspectives and we have different priorities.
107
00:06:17,000 --> 00:06:20,800
We have different things that we think are more important than others, right?
108
00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:28,320
And so we are optimized to have clinical care kind of be the driver of a lot of the resources
109
00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:29,640
we have.
110
00:06:29,640 --> 00:06:33,840
And they are optimized to have research and education be the driver of a lot of the resources
111
00:06:33,840 --> 00:06:34,840
they have.
112
00:06:34,840 --> 00:06:38,880
And when you bring that together in partnership, that's synergy because you can bring together
113
00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,960
a lot of clinical resources and they can bring together a lot of research resources.
114
00:06:41,960 --> 00:06:43,200
So it's really awesome.
115
00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:44,200
Okay.
116
00:06:44,200 --> 00:06:46,240
Access to a broader research pool.
117
00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:47,240
That's number one.
118
00:06:47,240 --> 00:06:50,280
Number two is complementary expertise.
119
00:06:50,280 --> 00:06:54,240
What I said at the beginning, your MD brain is thinking about patients a lot.
120
00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:56,920
You're thinking about that case that you can't crack.
121
00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:01,260
And then you gather together with your colleagues and you start talking about the case and somebody
122
00:07:01,260 --> 00:07:02,720
else has another case.
123
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:07,320
Similarly, you get to conferences, you're mostly talking about clinical cases.
124
00:07:07,320 --> 00:07:12,960
You're always in the clinical perspective, which is excellent because hey, everything
125
00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:17,160
we do in research is with the end goal of serving patients.
126
00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:23,120
And the people who are focused on flies, who are focused on worms, at the end of all of
127
00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:27,640
these discoveries is to serve patient care, is to serve patients.
128
00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:34,120
And so your very largely patient focused perspective is so important and it's not enough.
129
00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:39,760
And so the PhD researcher comes with deep methodologic expertise.
130
00:07:39,760 --> 00:07:44,200
I don't care how much time you spent doing research in your fellowship, or maybe you
131
00:07:44,200 --> 00:07:45,680
even went and got a PhD.
132
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:51,640
You have not spent nearly as much time as a PhD researcher has spent thinking about
133
00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:53,360
and conducting research.
134
00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:56,800
I will meet a lot of MD PhDs who said, well, I spent the same amount of time.
135
00:07:56,800 --> 00:07:58,680
And it's like, no, it's not the same.
136
00:07:58,680 --> 00:08:02,360
It's not the same when you were in your clinical space for a couple of years and then you came
137
00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:04,960
out and you went back to your PhD and you came out and went back.
138
00:08:04,960 --> 00:08:06,120
It's different.
139
00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:07,240
It is different.
140
00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:11,080
And it's not saying that you're any less qualified because I also get that too, where some of
141
00:08:11,080 --> 00:08:13,600
my MD PhDs would be like, I'm not less qualified.
142
00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:14,600
And I get that.
143
00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:20,080
But it's a pain point where sometimes you feel like you're inferior because as the MD,
144
00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:22,640
you come to the clinical space and people are like, oh, you've been in the lab for the
145
00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:23,640
last three years.
146
00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:24,640
What do you know?
147
00:08:24,640 --> 00:08:27,520
And then you go to the PhD space and then they're like, eh, you're always in the clinic.
148
00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:28,520
What do you know?
149
00:08:28,520 --> 00:08:30,720
And so there's this feeling of where do I belong?
150
00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:34,640
And I get that from my MD PhDs and I just want to honor that.
151
00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:39,640
And I also want to say that you have a different perspective that a PhD scientist doesn't have
152
00:08:39,640 --> 00:08:41,240
and an MD scientist doesn't have.
153
00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:42,560
You have a unique perspective.
154
00:08:42,560 --> 00:08:43,600
So celebrate that.
155
00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:45,280
You're not like everybody else.
156
00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:46,280
You're unique.
157
00:08:46,280 --> 00:08:52,480
But the reality is, and when we look at PhD researchers, they've had more time, more focused
158
00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:58,940
time over time invested in research in a way that MDs have not had the luxury of having.
159
00:08:58,940 --> 00:09:05,480
And so when you bring down, bring together your expertise in mostly clinical care, even
160
00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:10,320
if you have an MD PhD and you have research experience, a PhD scientist is bringing a
161
00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:12,000
totally different perspective.
162
00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:16,760
They don't have the clinical perspective, but their expertise is deep in a certain area
163
00:09:16,760 --> 00:09:17,760
of research.
164
00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:20,680
Their methodologic expertise is big.
165
00:09:20,680 --> 00:09:24,920
And they have a team that has complementary expertise as well.
166
00:09:24,920 --> 00:09:28,180
They're working with a postdoc who also has expertise in this area.
167
00:09:28,180 --> 00:09:33,440
You bring your team together and their team together and it's a powerful synergy.
168
00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:37,480
So the second benefit is complementary expertise.
169
00:09:37,480 --> 00:09:40,920
The third benefit is that you're bringing diverse perspectives.
170
00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:45,000
And I don't have to go into this for too long because that kind of speaks to the things
171
00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:47,200
I've talked about earlier.
172
00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:50,840
You are very clear on how the patient can be helped.
173
00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:53,040
You're very clear on the definition of the disease.
174
00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:56,360
You're very clear on who's an affected individual, who's not.
175
00:09:56,360 --> 00:09:57,440
You know all these things.
176
00:09:57,440 --> 00:09:59,200
You take them for granted.
177
00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:02,480
You have no idea that nobody else is thinking like you.
178
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:08,260
For example, one of my great colleagues and friends, we write together and we have a project
179
00:10:08,260 --> 00:10:15,040
that we're doing together and we are focused on a disease called TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic
180
00:10:15,040 --> 00:10:17,480
perfora, for those of you who remember.
181
00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:19,840
And TTP is not ITP.
182
00:10:19,840 --> 00:10:24,840
So there's some confusion in the literature where people want to say immune TTP is ITTP,
183
00:10:24,840 --> 00:10:28,480
which is so confusing because immune thrombocytopenia is ITP.
184
00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:30,560
I mean, whose idea is this?
185
00:10:30,560 --> 00:10:33,500
Okay, I'm going to get off that box right now.
186
00:10:33,500 --> 00:10:36,080
But it's confusing to the best of us.
187
00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:41,360
And so if we're paying attention as clinicians, we're like, of course, ITTP is not ITP.
188
00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:43,760
My colleague has no idea.
189
00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:50,280
She has no idea that we're confused enough to use the same kind of three letters to describe
190
00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:53,760
two different diseases that are very similar.
191
00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:57,680
Why would I think a thrombocytopenic disease that's ITTP is different from a thrombocytopenic
192
00:10:57,680 --> 00:10:58,680
disease that's ITP?
193
00:10:58,680 --> 00:11:01,000
Why wouldn't we just call it a different name?
194
00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:05,840
Okay, I'm going to come back down because that does irk me.
195
00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:06,840
This is really confusing.
196
00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:09,120
I know as a hematologist, I will never be confused.
197
00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:13,560
I know ITP is ITTP, but you know, if it was just hematologists reading the literature,
198
00:11:13,560 --> 00:11:16,640
then yes, call it whatever you want.
199
00:11:16,640 --> 00:11:20,180
But anyway, I digress.
200
00:11:20,180 --> 00:11:24,600
But when my PhD scientist goes looking in the literature, she comes back with papers
201
00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:26,800
who have that and they're all talking about ITP.
202
00:11:26,800 --> 00:11:28,760
And she's like, oh my gosh, this is so exciting.
203
00:11:28,760 --> 00:11:34,600
In fact, I've seen published papers where people are talking about ITTP and they're
204
00:11:34,600 --> 00:11:37,360
actually they have a cohort of patients who have ITP.
205
00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:39,440
So they're like, oh my gosh, bleeding is increasing this population.
206
00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:41,780
I'm like, but this is the wrong population.
207
00:11:41,780 --> 00:11:44,140
Who was your partner?
208
00:11:44,140 --> 00:11:45,760
So we come with diverse perspectives.
209
00:11:45,760 --> 00:11:50,280
So in clinical things, as an MD, you know, you know the deal.
210
00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:52,560
You would never be confused that ITTP is ITP.
211
00:11:52,560 --> 00:11:54,520
You would never be confused.
212
00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:57,040
The PhD scientist doesn't think about anything clinical.
213
00:11:57,040 --> 00:12:00,880
In fact, they know methodology inside and out.
214
00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:05,760
And they would never be confused about certain assays or certain experimental methods.
215
00:12:05,760 --> 00:12:10,280
For example, yesterday I was in a meeting with two biostatisticians and they were speaking
216
00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:12,040
and I literally was doing this.
217
00:12:12,040 --> 00:12:15,760
Like, OK, if you're listening to me, I was like my head would turn to the left and then
218
00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:18,000
I would turn to the right and then I would look at the person on the left and I would
219
00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:21,880
look at the person on the right and I would be like, holy cow, I don't understand what
220
00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:26,640
you're saying because when they get together, they speak a different language.
221
00:12:26,640 --> 00:12:31,880
And they have totally different perspective from me and it's so beautiful because when
222
00:12:31,880 --> 00:12:37,120
they start flying off into biostatistical heaven, I pull them back down and I say, hey,
223
00:12:37,120 --> 00:12:41,560
the problem we're solving is here on Earth.
224
00:12:41,560 --> 00:12:43,200
It is so beautiful.
225
00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:49,200
But they have diverse perspectives that really come together and give us like a brand new
226
00:12:49,200 --> 00:12:51,400
view of the problem.
227
00:12:51,400 --> 00:12:56,800
And so here, it's kind of like two eyes coming together to see in a way that one eye can't
228
00:12:56,800 --> 00:12:57,800
see alone.
229
00:12:57,800 --> 00:13:02,440
It's like you have the peripheral vision and it just comes together and it gives you compound
230
00:13:02,440 --> 00:13:09,760
vision in a way that one eye, which is doing great by itself, can't do except when two
231
00:13:09,760 --> 00:13:14,540
eyes come together and then they're really able to give you a really great perspective.
232
00:13:14,540 --> 00:13:17,720
You can see all sides, all sorts of things.
233
00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:23,960
And so diverse perspectives are so important and you don't get more diverse than the MD-PhD
234
00:13:23,960 --> 00:13:24,960
partnership.
235
00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:29,280
Now, you think you're diverse when you jump from hematology, you'll meet a pathologist
236
00:13:29,280 --> 00:13:33,840
at some diversity, but it's still a very deep clinical orientation.
237
00:13:33,840 --> 00:13:41,440
So diversify your clinical team, yes, but especially diversify your research team with
238
00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:44,680
deep PhD methodologic expertise.
239
00:13:44,680 --> 00:13:45,680
Okay.
240
00:13:45,680 --> 00:13:50,040
Oh, one of the things, one of the ones I'm most excited about is number four.
241
00:13:50,040 --> 00:13:53,360
Can you tell I'm so excited?
242
00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:54,760
It's about peer mentoring.
243
00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:56,400
It is about peer mentoring.
244
00:13:56,400 --> 00:14:00,320
It's about the fact that the two of you come together, you start finding out that you think
245
00:14:00,320 --> 00:14:05,800
differently about things, you know different things, and now you can educate each other.
246
00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:11,400
For example, when my PhD scientist collaborator comes to me with an ITP document and she's
247
00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:16,920
so excited about what she's learned, I can educate her about the difference between ITP
248
00:14:16,920 --> 00:14:18,560
and ITTP.
249
00:14:18,560 --> 00:14:23,760
I can do that very easily and not in a judgmental way because we're colleagues.
250
00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:31,080
And when I say, oh, this is not, this instrument is not valid, she can gently correct me and
251
00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:35,840
say, well, what we say is that there is no validity evidence.
252
00:14:35,840 --> 00:14:37,920
You know, that just doesn't feel as powerful.
253
00:14:37,920 --> 00:14:38,920
It's not valid.
254
00:14:38,920 --> 00:14:41,720
It feels more powerful than there's no validity evidence.
255
00:14:41,720 --> 00:14:44,840
So I'm always, it took me a long time to move away from this.
256
00:14:44,840 --> 00:14:48,280
These instruments are not now, but it's great.
257
00:14:48,280 --> 00:14:50,080
It's great peer mentoring because I'm learning.
258
00:14:50,080 --> 00:14:51,080
I'm learning.
259
00:14:51,080 --> 00:14:55,280
I have never taken a qualitative research methods course and perhaps I should, but I
260
00:14:55,280 --> 00:14:56,280
haven't.
261
00:14:56,280 --> 00:15:00,160
I'm working with somebody who's an expert in qualitative methods.
262
00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:05,880
This person teaches qualitative methods and I learned so much just by being around her.
263
00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:07,680
I don't even have to audit her class.
264
00:15:07,680 --> 00:15:09,880
I can just be around her and learn so much.
265
00:15:09,880 --> 00:15:13,700
And she can be around me and learn so much about clinical things.
266
00:15:13,700 --> 00:15:16,720
And so it's a beautiful peer mentoring that happens as well.
267
00:15:16,720 --> 00:15:21,560
When we write grants, the way we write, I write and then she's like, well, you know,
268
00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:25,620
you couldn't, you wouldn't really say it this way because they speak a whole different language
269
00:15:25,620 --> 00:15:26,840
than I do.
270
00:15:26,840 --> 00:15:31,660
And similarly when she writes it, I say, oh, clinically we would not do this.
271
00:15:31,660 --> 00:15:34,360
When we say, oh, these are the end points we're going to measure, I would say, clinically
272
00:15:34,360 --> 00:15:35,920
these are not meaningful.
273
00:15:35,920 --> 00:15:40,720
And so we're mentoring each other and it's so powerful, so powerful because on the one
274
00:15:40,720 --> 00:15:46,600
hand when you're thinking about your mentor mentoring you, it's a hierarchical relationship.
275
00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:49,320
And there are some things you're afraid to ask about because you feel like you should
276
00:15:49,320 --> 00:15:50,860
already know them.
277
00:15:50,860 --> 00:15:56,120
And sometimes you ask and your mentor looks at you saying like, you don't know that?
278
00:15:56,120 --> 00:15:59,620
And even when they're trying to be, they try to be nonjudgmental, you feel the hierarchy
279
00:15:59,620 --> 00:16:00,880
of their position.
280
00:16:00,880 --> 00:16:03,720
You feel it because medicine is so hierarchical.
281
00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:08,840
And so when you work with a collaborator, a PhD scientist who's maybe at your level,
282
00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:11,720
and even if they're not, you're learning from each other.
283
00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:14,800
It's a beautiful peer mentoring relationship.
284
00:16:14,800 --> 00:16:16,040
That's powerful.
285
00:16:16,040 --> 00:16:17,080
You're both learning.
286
00:16:17,080 --> 00:16:18,200
It's nonjudgmental.
287
00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:19,280
You're advancing.
288
00:16:19,280 --> 00:16:21,640
It makes your experience fun.
289
00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:27,480
So yes, number four is my favorite one is that peer mentoring happens because you're
290
00:16:27,480 --> 00:16:29,120
coming from different disciplines.
291
00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:33,160
And if you're going to be able to work together, you have to speak the same language and you
292
00:16:33,160 --> 00:16:35,800
both can come together to do that.
293
00:16:35,800 --> 00:16:41,560
Number five is that you also get access to interdisciplinary grant opportunities.
294
00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:45,240
So when me and my collaborator came together, I'm going to shout her out because sometimes
295
00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:47,200
she listens to this podcast.
296
00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:49,200
Hey, Theresa.
297
00:16:49,200 --> 00:16:52,340
When we come together, we have different grant opportunities.
298
00:16:52,340 --> 00:16:58,280
So my collaborator will say, hey, I have a lot of experience writing grants and being
299
00:16:58,280 --> 00:17:00,000
successful with FDA.
300
00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:04,200
I don't have as much experience in writing grants and being successful with NIH.
301
00:17:04,200 --> 00:17:07,960
And at the time, I actually didn't have experience being successful with grants with NIH, but
302
00:17:07,960 --> 00:17:12,200
we came together and we wrote a grant for NIH and we were successful.
303
00:17:12,200 --> 00:17:15,240
And we're going to come together, we're going to write a grant for FDA, and we're going
304
00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:16,240
to be successful.
305
00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:22,720
You know, we both have different opportunities and interdisciplinary opportunities come together
306
00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:24,480
when we come together to write grants.
307
00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:28,920
And so it's a really beautiful opportunity to now expand the bucket where you literally
308
00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:33,280
have the three grants in your society that everyone applies for.
309
00:17:33,280 --> 00:17:37,840
You can now really expand the pie and now you can apply for grants that only PhDs apply
310
00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:40,880
to, but you are collaborators together.
311
00:17:40,880 --> 00:17:45,440
So there's the part for you as the MD and there's the part for you as the PhD.
312
00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:52,280
And so you have access to more funding opportunities than you do if you're going it alone with
313
00:17:52,280 --> 00:17:54,680
just you and your clinical team.
314
00:17:54,680 --> 00:17:56,560
It is a beautiful thing.
315
00:17:56,560 --> 00:17:59,160
Your wealth is involved in this partnership.
316
00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:05,840
If I haven't sold you on this partnership by now, I feel like I will get you.
317
00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:07,960
I have two more things to talk about.
318
00:18:07,960 --> 00:18:16,000
Number six is that when you write grants together, there is powerful synergy.
319
00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:18,000
There is powerful synergy.
320
00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:23,960
So I will tell you that one of the most fun experiences, oh my goodness, that I've ever
321
00:18:23,960 --> 00:18:28,640
had writing grants was writing a grant with my PhD collaborator.
322
00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:34,920
It was so fun because one, we both owned the grant and we both really came at it with diverse
323
00:18:34,920 --> 00:18:37,520
perspectives and complementary expertise.
324
00:18:37,520 --> 00:18:42,120
Now when it comes to background and significance, I own the grant.
325
00:18:42,120 --> 00:18:48,920
And I say that not bragging, with humility, but just saying that I understand where this
326
00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:51,600
applies to patients because I think about patients a lot.
327
00:18:51,600 --> 00:18:57,400
I certainly think about patients a lot more compared to my PhD scientist collaborator.
328
00:18:57,400 --> 00:19:02,400
And she knows how it can help people, but not to the extent to which I know because
329
00:19:02,400 --> 00:19:05,720
I've been thinking about clinical medicine for over 20 years.
330
00:19:05,720 --> 00:19:10,680
So yeah, I can write the background and significance and really relate it to patients really well.
331
00:19:10,680 --> 00:19:12,520
And it doesn't mean she can't do that.
332
00:19:12,520 --> 00:19:14,200
It just means that it's easier for me to do.
333
00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:17,720
So I will take the background significance first and I'll write it.
334
00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:20,720
And she, oh my goodness, she's king when it comes to methodology.
335
00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:25,080
I mean, I have an idea and sometimes I've put together some nice paragraphs with methodology.
336
00:19:25,080 --> 00:19:28,240
But to be honest, she's so much better than me.
337
00:19:28,240 --> 00:19:29,240
She's faster.
338
00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:31,120
She's just, wow, she's good.
339
00:19:31,120 --> 00:19:32,920
She's really good.
340
00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:34,320
And so we divide and conquer the grant.
341
00:19:34,320 --> 00:19:36,720
I say, I'm going to write the background significance first.
342
00:19:36,720 --> 00:19:39,720
You focus on the approach and then we're going to switch.
343
00:19:39,720 --> 00:19:44,560
Because now when I go back to like revising the approach, I revise from my clinical perspective.
344
00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:49,320
And when she goes to revise the background significance, she's revising from her PhD
345
00:19:49,320 --> 00:19:51,600
methodology expertise.
346
00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:54,040
And so it is powerful synergy.
347
00:19:54,040 --> 00:19:56,640
I mean, we write great grants together.
348
00:19:56,640 --> 00:19:59,920
And so I remember the first time we wrote a grant together.
349
00:19:59,920 --> 00:20:02,400
And I mean, it was just such a powerful experience.
350
00:20:02,400 --> 00:20:04,560
And I knew, I'm like, this is a good grant.
351
00:20:04,560 --> 00:20:05,720
We both felt that way.
352
00:20:05,720 --> 00:20:07,720
Like, this is a great grant.
353
00:20:07,720 --> 00:20:11,480
And I have to tell you, I got on a plane and there was the worst kind of turbulence.
354
00:20:11,480 --> 00:20:12,920
I mean, there was someone screaming on the plane.
355
00:20:12,920 --> 00:20:14,400
That's how bad the turbulence was.
356
00:20:14,400 --> 00:20:15,400
It was turbulent.
357
00:20:15,400 --> 00:20:20,480
And I remember thinking, I was like, this plane is not going to go down because we just
358
00:20:20,480 --> 00:20:23,480
wrote a great grant.
359
00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:28,080
That's how much confidence I had in the grant.
360
00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:30,000
I mean, the confidence is not in the grant.
361
00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:33,200
But just I was like, I had such a sense of purpose about the grant.
362
00:20:33,200 --> 00:20:36,800
Like the work we were going to do felt so powerful.
363
00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:39,400
I knew there was no way I was going to die before doing that work.
364
00:20:39,400 --> 00:20:41,720
I was like, nope, I'm not crashing in this plane.
365
00:20:41,720 --> 00:20:43,760
I know that for a fact.
366
00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:46,440
And it came from the powerful synergy we had of writing the grant.
367
00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:49,920
I would tell you, even if I got on the plane that day, I was the last person on the plane
368
00:20:49,920 --> 00:20:54,280
because I was putting some finishing touches to like one of the pages of the grant.
369
00:20:54,280 --> 00:20:59,560
And I was like, I'm going to finish this page before I get on the plane.
370
00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:02,240
It was such a synergistic grant writing experience.
371
00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:04,560
It absolutely was.
372
00:21:04,560 --> 00:21:09,960
And I do want to pause and say that you have to find the right person.
373
00:21:09,960 --> 00:21:13,720
This is not like, oh, every PhD scientist I write with is going to be a powerful, you
374
00:21:13,720 --> 00:21:14,720
know, powerful experience.
375
00:21:14,720 --> 00:21:19,200
I've written with other PhD scientists where they literally were like, you're on your own.
376
00:21:19,200 --> 00:21:20,200
Good luck.
377
00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:23,040
Show me the grant and I'll help you edit it.
378
00:21:23,040 --> 00:21:26,520
This was really two of us coming together to really write something that was synergistic.
379
00:21:26,520 --> 00:21:30,160
And so it has to be mutual commitment.
380
00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:34,400
You don't just find someone off the street and say, well, write with me.
381
00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:35,560
There's relationship building.
382
00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:36,560
There's chemistry.
383
00:21:36,560 --> 00:21:38,280
That is important.
384
00:21:38,280 --> 00:21:44,280
But it really is a powerful synergy when two people who are like-minded, but from different
385
00:21:44,280 --> 00:21:46,920
perspectives come together to create something.
386
00:21:46,920 --> 00:21:48,880
It's really a powerful synergy.
387
00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:51,480
Finally, increased productivity.
388
00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:52,480
Increased productivity.
389
00:21:52,480 --> 00:21:56,760
You know, this one probably doesn't need too much explanation.
390
00:21:56,760 --> 00:21:58,840
You both have different perspectives.
391
00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:00,400
You can submit to different journals.
392
00:22:00,400 --> 00:22:04,400
For example, we have manuscript and we're like, should we submit to a qualitative research
393
00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:06,960
focused journal, health services focused journal?
394
00:22:06,960 --> 00:22:12,280
Or should we submit to a hematology focused journal?
395
00:22:12,280 --> 00:22:13,280
We have options.
396
00:22:13,280 --> 00:22:16,160
And so, yeah, we can do that.
397
00:22:16,160 --> 00:22:20,160
And for example, we're thinking about a project that we're working on together and we're like,
398
00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:23,240
okay, well, why don't we lay out what the landscape should look like?
399
00:22:23,240 --> 00:22:28,640
How about we just write a paper that describes why it's important for us to do the work we're
400
00:22:28,640 --> 00:22:29,640
doing?
401
00:22:29,640 --> 00:22:31,720
Let's lay the foundation for why our work is important.
402
00:22:31,720 --> 00:22:35,600
I mean, we did that in the grant anyway, so why not just write the paper out of it?
403
00:22:35,600 --> 00:22:38,240
And then as we're starting to work, we're like, wait a minute, why don't we publish
404
00:22:38,240 --> 00:22:39,240
our protocol?
405
00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:41,300
Wow, there's another manuscript, right?
406
00:22:41,300 --> 00:22:43,920
And I'm working on some manuscripts, she's working on other manuscripts.
407
00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:46,680
It really allows us to be super productive.
408
00:22:46,680 --> 00:22:50,080
And then we have different avenues that we can send our work to.
409
00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:54,080
And so it's a really powerful, powerful, powerful experience.
410
00:22:54,080 --> 00:22:56,800
Okay, so I shared seven things.
411
00:22:56,800 --> 00:22:57,800
I shared seven things.
412
00:22:57,800 --> 00:22:59,520
I want to summarize them.
413
00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:02,880
Access to border resource pool.
414
00:23:02,880 --> 00:23:05,800
You get access to a broader resource pool.
415
00:23:05,800 --> 00:23:09,800
You have complementary expertise, diverse perspectives.
416
00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:11,800
You can mentor each other, so peer mentoring.
417
00:23:11,800 --> 00:23:15,080
You have interdisciplinary grant writing opportunities.
418
00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:20,200
You have synergistic grant writing, and you have increased productivity.
419
00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:26,920
So if you are an MD researcher, even if you're MD PhD, and you're like, oh, I don't really
420
00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:31,040
have any PhD scientists in my collaboration pool.
421
00:23:31,040 --> 00:23:36,880
I want you to think about who is like you, similarly looking for opportunities.
422
00:23:36,880 --> 00:23:40,360
Many times we're looking for the senior mentors just to give us the light of day.
423
00:23:40,360 --> 00:23:43,280
And in reality, they're so full, they don't care about us, right?
424
00:23:43,280 --> 00:23:44,280
They're not hungry.
425
00:23:44,280 --> 00:23:47,200
But there are people who are on the same level as you.
426
00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:51,000
They are early career, and they are hungry for collaborators.
427
00:23:51,000 --> 00:23:55,320
And you are an expert person that they can partner with.
428
00:23:55,320 --> 00:23:57,480
Yes, you don't have all the resources.
429
00:23:57,480 --> 00:24:00,200
Yes, you don't have all the opportunities.
430
00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:05,320
But wow, when two of you come together, you can really create something amazing.
431
00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:07,360
So who might you partner with?
432
00:24:07,360 --> 00:24:11,720
I want to invite you to think about your PhD friends, or at least somebody who can link
433
00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:16,740
you to a PhD colleague who has complementary expertise.
434
00:24:16,740 --> 00:24:20,200
And see if you reach out to them and set up a meeting, just this week.
435
00:24:20,200 --> 00:24:24,600
Set up a meeting and talk, see what's possible.
436
00:24:24,600 --> 00:24:27,080
And I'd love to hear about how the conversation went.
437
00:24:27,080 --> 00:24:31,440
And it may be that it goes well, and you start thinking about a collaboration, or it may
438
00:24:31,440 --> 00:24:33,880
be that it doesn't go well.
439
00:24:33,880 --> 00:24:39,200
But at least you are working to expand your networks and to create the kind of synergy
440
00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:40,920
that allows you to really go far.
441
00:24:40,920 --> 00:24:41,920
All right.
442
00:24:41,920 --> 00:24:44,000
It's been a pleasure talking with you today.
443
00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:49,000
As always, if you're looking for a coach, I'm happy to support you in that process.
444
00:24:49,000 --> 00:24:54,880
And I want you to succeed, because we need more clinicians winning in research.
445
00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:57,520
And it's so hard, because we're not set up to do it.
446
00:24:57,520 --> 00:25:01,080
Our clinical departments, even though they tell us they want to do research, they don't
447
00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:02,800
really support us to do it.
448
00:25:02,800 --> 00:25:06,380
And so it takes time, it takes effort, it takes energy.
449
00:25:06,380 --> 00:25:08,080
And I would love to see you win.
450
00:25:08,080 --> 00:25:09,080
All right.
451
00:25:09,080 --> 00:25:13,560
Until next time, I look forward to talking with you again on the Clinician Researcher
452
00:25:13,560 --> 00:25:14,560
podcast.
453
00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:15,560
Have a great day.
454
00:25:15,560 --> 00:25:16,560
Thanks for listening to this episode of the Clinician Researcher podcast.
455
00:25:16,560 --> 00:25:31,760
Where academic clinicians learn the skills to build their own research program, whether
456
00:25:31,760 --> 00:25:34,160
or not they have a mentor.
457
00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:40,280
If you found the information in this episode to be helpful, don't keep it all to yourself.
458
00:25:40,280 --> 00:25:42,040
Someone else needs to hear it.
459
00:25:42,040 --> 00:25:46,080
So take a minute right now and share it.
460
00:25:46,080 --> 00:25:51,520
As you share this episode, you become part of our mission to help launch a new generation
461
00:25:51,520 --> 00:26:20,080
of clinician researchers who make transformative discoveries that change the way we do healthcare.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Listen On
New to Clinician Researcher?
Feb. 5, 2024
Keys to Your Success - The Importance of Focus
In this episode, we explore the pivotal role of focus. In the journey to becoming a clinician scientist, we discuss the complexities of balancing clinical responsibilities, research, and administrative duties. Key Points Disc...
Jan. 5, 2024
Welcome to 2024!
In this episode, the Clinician Researcher Podcast sets off Season 2 with a focus on supporting clinicians transitioning to researchers while emphasizing authenticity and individuality. Key Points Discussed: Transitioning to a...
Sept. 4, 2023
How to negotiate your salary
Salary negotiations in academic medicine can be challenging. It is especially challenging because no one teaches you how to negotiate well. In this episode, we break down the salary negotiation process. This process highlight...
Aug. 7, 2023
How to negotiate for protected time
In this episode, we explore the art of negotiating protected time. Negotiate time to advance your research and career by doing the following things: Get clarity on what protected time will do for you. Develop a strategic plan...
Aug. 3, 2023
Why do I need protected time?
Podcast Show Notes - Clinician Researcher, Episode 3: Why do I need protected time? Welcome to another enlightening episode of the "Clinician Researcher" podcast. In this episode, we delve into the concept of "Protected Time"...
Aug. 2, 2023
Can I succeed with or without a mentor?
Podcast Show Notes - Clinician Researcher, Episode 2: Can I Succeed with or without a Mentor? Did you know that mentorship plays a crucial role in shaping the success of clinicians and researchers? According to a systematic r...
Aug. 1, 2023
Why Clinicians Should Lead Research
Welcome to the inaugural episode of the "Clinician Researcher" podcast, where we empower clinicians to become successful research leaders. In this inaugural episode, we explore why clinicians should lead research programs. We...